I know, I know, but this revision compiles
I know, I know, but this revision compiles
You sound like the guy who writes documentation in the form of:
// functionA = is function that does A
/s
Has it though?
AFAIK it has like 4k tokens which roughly translate to 3k words or something like that.
The API has 8k or even 32k (this model should be interesting for something like that, unfortunately still don’t have access to it…)
So the docs have to be rather short, that it gets all the relevant stuff, or am I missing something?
I usually get distracted reading one of the different APIs in the documentation and went down on a rabbit hole reading the whole history of some totally unrelated thing that just popped into my head and then realized what I had to do when I was going to bed and I ended up working thru the night.
The other times I got stuck for a couple of hours looking for new themes for my code editor because I didn’t like how my current theme looked.
Oh well ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
WAIT WAIT who made this??? It’s unreadable!!!
He speaks while on Battle Cat, then departs on a Battle Ram? It’s unconscionable. So pedestrian.
I copied and pasted some code from their own docs and it was missing required fields and those fields weren’t clear or documented well. Going into their code helped more but still.
Also, the docs weren’t written with me in mind. It’s like if you were already familiar with it or a previous version because I swear I read it four times.
“Documentation”
Spoken like someone who never came close to SAP