Several years ago at Microsoft, I saw an observation that there were 3 primary business models in big tech. Selling

1. Software
2. Hardware
3. Ads

The challenge for companies was that your core business was being given away for free by someone with a different business model. You sell Windows and Google gives away Android for the search ads revenue. Lots of hardware sold at a loss to make up the difference in subscriptions.

This is what’s happening with streaming. https://stratechery.com/2023/disneys-taylor-swift-era/

Disney’s Taylor Swift Era

Not even Taylor Swift can fight the devaluation of recorded music, but she makes it up in physical experiences; Disney isn’t much different, but it looks much worse given the company’s …

Stratechery by Ben Thompson

The key question for Bob Iger is whether Disney+ is intended to be a real business which means higher prices, more ads and cheaper shows or is it enough if they can get usage of Disney+ to lead to increased likelihood of going to Disneyland or taking a Disney cruise.

The former is the Netflix model while the latter is the Amazon Prime model.

@carnage4life I think the thing missing in the Amazon Prime comparison is that Prime grants a lot of benefits to the subscription (shipping and Prime Video for instance) which in turn leads to higher same store revenue. Disney+ doesn't grant you any benefits on a Disney Cruise or Disney Park visit AFAIK
@carnage4life I actually think an interesting flip on the Amazon example which is very similar to Disney is F1TV. I paid $2.5K for a premium race ticket last year and I got F1TV for the full season for free. On top of that I got a lot of free gifts. Feels like you could see a world where a family pass of premium tickets to a Disney Park gets you a free year of Disney+