Billboards featuring OnlyFans model ruled ‘not overtly sexual’ by UK advertising watchdog

https://lemmy.zip/post/1891140

Billboards featuring OnlyFans model ruled ‘not overtly sexual’ by UK advertising watchdog - Lemmy.zip

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1891139 [https://lemmy.zip/post/1891139] > Archived version: https://archive.ph/OvFse [https://archive.ph/OvFse] > Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825144949/https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/08/23/billboards-featuring-onlyfans-model-ruled-not-overtly-sexual-by-uk-advertising-watchdog [https://web.archive.org/web/20230825144949/https://www.euronews.com/culture/2023/08/23/billboards-featuring-onlyfans-model-ruled-not-overtly-sexual-by-uk-advertising-watchdog]

What an incredibly European headline.

This is why I love America, the first amendment is dope.

Edit: It's hilarious to see the usual Lemmy leftists spazzing out in the replies. A lot of them is just them being made about grooming being banned in certain contexts, but the only thing they're materially wrong is about the general state of physical displays in America as a whole. The local policies of Florida for example aren't nationalized, they're locally specific to the state of Florida exclusively.

Meanwhile the US bans books for being too sexual
The US does not ban books but they do ban some of them from public libraries, especially school libraries, and for good reason.
What’s the good reason to ban a book? Because it makes you think?

What’s the good reason to ban a book?

There aren’t any.

Because it makes you think?

Christ, no. “Making you think” is kinda the whole reason books exist, so I don’t know why you would think that?

Probably because your previous comment said that books are banned "for good reason"
It also said “public libraries” which the comment I replied to (intentionally) omitted.