BagOfHammersTrump says he'll "proudly be arrested" tomorrow in Georgia
bloopernovaI still think he’s going to pull some stunt. He’s incapable of just simply obeying something like this.
He’s eating this up. He is getting all the attention he wants and his poll numbers are going up.
He’s an attention vampire and the left keep wanting to feed him.
YoBuckStopsHereOJ complex
Exactly. The more attention he receives. The better he does in polls.
Everyone just needs to take away his platform. Stop giving him what he craves
joeWhat does this look like in context? Not charging him for crimes? Not covering this extremely newsworthy event?
Wait till after the election and then charge him.
The more attention they give him. The more it’s helping him in the polls. Isolate him and ignore him.
He’s not going to win the election unless they keep giving him the spotlight.
If he wins in court, which is very likely, he’ll become even more popular.
The only way to stop Trump is by taking away his audience.
If he wins in court, which is very likely,
Show your work here, because none of the actual lawyers I’ve seen weigh in on this have come to that conclusion.
www.usatoday.com/story/news/…/70604721007/
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/…/ar-AA1fjKxW
Dershowitz is a well known legal expert. He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.
snipganNo he didn't.
"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."
"They're all going to raise it," said Eric Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University. "Trump is going to argue that he and all his merry people were simply ensuring the integrity and fairness of federal elections, something they had an obligation to do, and therefore he has immunity."
Segall said the laws protecting federal officials from state prosecution serve an important purpose. Consider, for instance, federal officials working to desegregate the South during the civil rights era being thrown in jail by state officials opposed to those efforts. But Segall stressed that he doesn’t believe the facts of Trump's intervention will warrant immunity.
He saying that's their approach. Ultimately might come down to the Supreme Court which hasn't favored Trump and similar cases so far.
Trump wins on appeal. That means in wins in court. Do you think appeals is not a court ?
I don’t SCOTUS defending Trump. They’ve yet to intervene for him and I only see them stepping in this time. Most likely this will be ruled at a lower court
That's not what Dershowitz said.
What do you think he says?
I just showed you what he said in the articles you provided.
And he wins on appeal. What part do you think is incorrect about what I said?
Do you think appeals courts are not courts ?
Again. He didn't say that. You are incorrect.
I didn't say anything otherwise.
He said exactly what I said. SMH.
What do you think is different ? Use your words.
"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."
This is what he said correct?
Yes which matches what I said. Use your words. I’m not going back and forth fifty times because you can’t form a coherent discussion.
Point out what you think I stated incorrectly and we can discourse that. Otherwise this is a waste of my time.
He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.
This what you said, correct?
Yes. That is exactly what he states in the quote. Trump wins on appeal.
And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?
I am not going to read the article to you.
If you don’t get what he’s saying that on you and not an error in what I said.
Have a good day
It is an error on you.
"I predict there'll be some convictions," speculated the lawyer. "I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast," he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are "rushing" to get their cases against Trump to trial.
He didn't just say Trump would win on appeal or "He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals." He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.
You are being dishonest.
Well I can tell you’re not a lawyer.
If the conviction is overturned in appeal then Trump wins. That would null the conviction.
Have a good day