Pride flag killing suspect appears to have a long history of anti-LGBTQ social posts

https://lemmy.world/post/3660014

Pride flag killing suspect appears to have a long history of anti-LGBTQ social posts - Lemmy.world

The 27-year-old man who police say shot and killed a California business owner over a Pride flag draped in her store appears to have had a yearslong history of posting disturbing — and often violent — anti-LGBTQ messages on social media. The suspect, Travis Ikeguchi, gunned down Laura Ann Carleton, 66, on Friday, after confronting her and “yelling many homophobic slurs” over her clothing store’s Pride flag, San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus said at a news conference Monday. Shortly after fleeing the store, Mag.Pi, Ikeguchi was killed in a shootout with law enforcement.

There’s no such thing as homophobia, I wish people would stop saying that. 🤦🏻‍♂️

For me, the bigger issue is how this person got a gun in the first place.

That is literally one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

There is absolutely homophobia. There are people who very specifically go out of their way to harass primarily LGBTQ individuals. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US experienced this even in school as a child.

No, it’s called bigotry.

If I see a queer person, I don’t go running for the hills, nor do they make me feel irrationally uncomfortable or fearful.

I get what you’re trying to say: “It’s not fear, it’s hate” but we call that hate homophobia and everyone agrees on the meaning.
Exactly. And since we already have words for that, I don’t understand why people have to make up new terminology. If the article called him a bigot, I would still know what the shooting was about.

“Homophobia” has been the accepted and predominant term for anti-gay bigotry for as long as I can remember; no one’s making up new terminology here.

And the word phobia has meant aversion or hatred since at least the 1800s

https://archive.org/details/gentlemansmagaz206unkngoog/page/786/mode/2up

Dude is so obsessed with the meaning of words he couldn't even do basic research

The Gentleman's magazine : Sylvanus Urban (pseud.), [from old catalog] ed : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb.

Internet Archive
If that makes you feel better. 🤦🏻‍♂️
I don't really feel anything about the dictionary definition of words tbh
Most don’t these days, they just make up their own meanings. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Yet you still don’t realize how badly you are failing to communicate in your comments. Which is the whole point of words right?
You are the only one doing that though. All you comments are basically projection (you can look up the definition of that term).
So has the term “Native American “, and that’s no more correct than the word “homophobia “. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Except “phobia” doesn’t solely mean “irrational fear”. As @[email protected] pointed out, “hydrophilia” and “hydrophobia” do not refer to chemicals that are literally in love with or afraid of water.

As I said in another comment, Native American has been the terminology for quite some time as well, regardless of the fact that it’s wrong.

My point, so you don’t think I’m trying a straw man argument. Just because something is used for a long time, by the majority of people, doesn’t make it inherently correct.

I don’t understand why people have to make up new terminology

I used google trends to show you they’re not; the term has been in common use for literally decades.

Further, you’ve been stating repeatedly in this thread that “homophobia” is incorrect semantically because it’s not a literal fear of gay people. But the literal dictionary definition of “phobia” proves you wrong on this.

Repeating the same alternative facts over and over in this thread doesn’t make them true.