Is it wrong to pirate movies I've purchased digitally and load onto my Plex server?

https://lemmy.ml/post/3688551

Is it wrong to pirate movies I've purchased digitally and load onto my Plex server? - Lemmy

Just would like to have a discussion on the topic. I’ve purchased around 20ish movies/shows on Vudu, and my wife has grown to be unhappy with Vudu’s UI and especially how the watch progress works. I am curious what some others thoughts on this are. My initial thoughts are I recognize I’ve purchased a license to watch the content, but feel that because I’ve purchased it I should have the right to retain total control over it and do what I please. I would like to purchase movies on physical media from now on, but wouldn’t like to repurchase all the same movies and shows again when I’ve already paid for them

Is it wrong to pirate movies […] and load onto my Plex server?

no

May I ask for your reasoning?
Because you’ve purchased the movies ya dingus

The writers and actors are on strike right now, and if you pay form media before their strike is over, it makes it easier for Hollywood to profit off existing media, ignore the writer and actors, and starve the writer and actors out.

If you want to support writers and actors while they are on strike, so that Hollywood folds first, consider donating to

2023 Writers Guild of America strike - Wikipedia

Numerous people ON the strike have debunked this, watching things made pre strike pays the actors and writers as well, just don’t consume post strike media.
Strike funds aren’t something you can debunk. And if they were being paid enough already, they wouldn’t be striking.
It’s completely down to your opinion. Legally I would guess that you’re not allowed to do it, but nowadays we live in a hellscape where we own nothing so I wouldn’t base your moral compass off of the rules that corporations set. Personally if I’ve already bought it somewhere it is mine. They’re lucky I even purchased one copy, they’re not getting anything else from me.
IMO I don’t see the problem, I see it as a personal backup of a media you legally licenced. Unless you resell the original without getting rid of the copy, or give a copy to someone who doesn’t own a license, it’s fair game.
Yeah that’s where I was kinda leaning since it’s just for my household’s use. Especially since I’ve already purchased it once.
It is never wrong to be a pirate.
Yeah it’s just for me personally I like to make sure I support the creators of the media I consume. Just what works for me.

Since you bought it, in theory you’ve supported the creators. Pirating it is 1000% fine in that case (or in any case)

In reality all the people who actually worked hard to make the film has been paid long before you bought it and the only creators getting the money are the owners of the companies. Unless you are buying from the creators source.

Since you’re talking about “wrong”, rather than “illegal”, you seem to approach this from a moral angle instead of a legal one. And when it comes to morality, that’s something you can only define for yourself.

Personally I don’t see any problems there, nor do I see a problem with pirating unlicensed content. If I would never have paid to watch a certain movie, the rightsholder doesn’t make a factual loss. They can cry about opportunity costs all day long, but if it’s not a “cinema vs. piracy” but a “piracy vs. nothing at all” discussion, it’s pretty much a moot point.

Yeah I know it’s not legal in my country and state, but was just trying to get a feel for different opinions on the morality of my question. For me I just like making sure the creator of the media I really enjoy get’s some kind of support, that way I’m voting a little with my dollar. So far I’m really thinking I’ve paid for the media once and once is more than enough.

You’ve paid for the right to watch the movie. The movie industry will argue that you’ve just paid for the right to access that physical copy and I’m sure from a legal point of view they’re right as they’ve lobbied to increase control out of greed and the hope of being able to get more money out of you for the same effort.

Morally you paid to access the content, you paid to compensate the creators for their work. Now you’re entitled to view what you’ve paid for.

If you want to support the creator, spread the word. Paying for things will generally just fill the purses of some rich ass media company execs who sit around all day masturbating on their third yacht.

By spreading the word, the creator is suddenly known for “having created this media that everyone knows”, landing them better deals with media corporations.

This concept applies to pretty much all media in all forms.

And when it comes to morality, that’s something you can only define for yourself.

Well the point of his coming here to discuss the ethics of it was to go beyond his own starting moral intuitions, to consider arguments and perspectives that pertain to the ethics of the act in question. The view that morality is a personal matter is a non-starter as far as moral philosophy goes. The ball is in OP’s court over who/what to consult to find relevant ethical considerations, and it’s up to him to reason those out and whether to follow them, but that doesn’t make the ethics itself something for him to define.

Yeah you’ve hit the nail on the head. I was merely trying to gain some perspectives outside my own. Ethics is not something for me to define at all. That being said, I’ve decided that I have paid for the media and as such have a right to retain full control over that media as long as I don’t sell it or distribute it widely.

I’m gonna just cut thru the larger spiel I would normally give.

No, it is not wrong. You paid for it in the sense of reasonable expectations of ownership. That means being able to watch it in as convenient a method as if you’d bought the VHS back in the day. While this may not line up with legal definitions of licenses, fuck them. Replace “file” or “stream” with “tape” and it becomes crystal clear.

Is it wrong to pirate {anything}

No.

please anyone help me find this book.
The development of chemical principles : Langford, Cooper Harold, 1934- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Originally published: Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, c1969, in series: Addison-Wesley series in chemistry

Internet Archive

::: you can download it off internet archive you need: windows - maybe, ive only tried on windows internet archive account adobe digital editions calibre with alf’s de-drm plug-in

borrow the book

put this link into your browser and replace bookid with the identifier https://archive.org/services/loans/loan/?action=media_url&identifier=BOOKID&format=pdf&redirect=1

you should get acsm file open it in adobe digital editions you now have drm-protected pdf in my documents/my digital editions/

add this pdf to calibre (with the plug in installed)

now you have drm-free pdf :::

You could also get it via annas archive: annas-archive.org/…/b121f6196830860e8c5e4a04b129a…
The development of chemical principles - Anna’s Archive

Langford, Cooper Harold, 1934-; Beebe, Ralph A. (Ralph Alonzo), b. 1898 Originally published: Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley, c1969, in series: Addison-Wesley series in ch New York: Dover

You’re asking this in a community that’s specifically about doing piracy. Pretty hard to take your question seriously in this context.
Well I just didn’t see any harm in feeling out a lot of different pirates opinions to see some different perspectives I maybe didn’t think of.
Asking if pirating something is wrong in a pro pirating group…
Its wrong they bought it in the first place…
It’s just a little less bad than murder.
yeah go for it! Do what you want. You already gave them money.

According to their ToS:

You are granted a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited right and license to access and use the Content solely for your private non-commercial viewing.

You must not transfer, copy or display Content except as permitted in this Vudu Policy.

They basically don’t allow you to download any movie to watch them outside their app. You are not actually “purchasing” the movies, you simply “purchasing” access to watch those movies on Vudu.

As for morality of downloading movies you already “purchased”, consider this quote I came across a little while ago: “Is piracy really stealing if paying isn’t owning?”

You have to decide if you have a duty to follow licensing agreements or not. Most folks here do not believe they do.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/#DeoThe

Deontological Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

In the US: you are legally allowed to have a backup copy if any media you have (digital -> physical, physical -> digital, or any other match up). Since you own the physical copy of these movies, this means you’re allowed to have the digital one as a backup.

Your physical disks are encrypted, and breaking said encryption to make a copy is technically illegal. Downloading the files from somewhere is not illegal, but sharing them is.

With all that said, if you own the disk, and either download or torrent without seeding, you’re well within your rights legally.

Your other option is to use Handbrake or another disk ripping software, along with dvdcss or aacs and rip your disks yourself.

In the US: you are legally allowed to have a backup copy if any media you have (digital -> physical, physical -> digital, or any other match up). Since you own the physical copy of these movies, this means you’re allowed to have the digital one as a backup.

Minor caveat: US law allows for a backup that you made from your own original medium. Downloading from torrents is still legally no bueno.

www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-digital.html - for reference if anyone is curious.
Copyright and Digital Files (FAQ) | U.S. Copyright Office

Frequently asked questions and answers about copyright and digital files

Why are you asking is piracy “wrong” on a piracy forum?
Just to have a discussion and get to see some of the different opinions out there.
Arrr, you’d better watch this to get a more nuanced perspective!
Piped

An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube frontend which is efficient by design.

100% what I was expecting the link to be
fucking piped links always broken.
Only if you brag of it in Lemmy.world, that way the police will catch you /s

Youve paid your fee, I see nothing morally questionable in what you are doing.

I'm with you on this one, you've bought it, you should be allowed to do as you please with it.

This is a corporate run late stage capitalism hell hole. Do whatever you want that doesn’t hurt people, unless they’re bad people.

Do you own the movie? Or does the studio own you?

Therein lies the answer.

Legally, it is illegal. Ethically, I think you're fine. If you pay for something you should be allowed to use the thing.

I feel like that basic interpretation of the law probably predates the code of Hammurabi.

In america you are legally allowed backups of anything you’ve bought.

Can I backup my computer software?

Yes, under certain conditions as provided by section 117 of the Copyright Act. Although the precise term used under section 117 is “archival” copy, not “backup” copy, these terms today are used interchangeably. This privilege extends only to computer programs and not to other types of works. Under section 117, you or someone you authorize may make a copy of an original computer program if the new copy is being made for archival (i.e., backup) purposes only; you are the legal owner of the copy; and any copy made for archival purposes is either destroyed, or transferred with the original copy, once the original copy is sold, given away, or otherwise transferred.

That applies to things you legally own. Digitally purchased items are leased to you; you do not own them. So that cutout to copyright law does not apply to digital goods.
Ethically spotless, yet still a crime.
Not necessarily - depends on the way of obtaining the file. Downloading a copyrighted video is not illegal (it’s fair use), sharing it with others is illegal. If they downloaded it directly without sharing, that’s perfectly legal.
nothing is wrong with piracy
The real crime is paying for content to begin with /s
No, because artificial scarcity is immoral.
I think it’s more wrong how writers make pennies while the fat suits at Hollywood make even more absurd amounts of money. Fuck them. Pirate.
Intellectual property doesn’t exist, so no, not wrong at all.

There’s a couple angles you can take on this. My favourite is from the dotCommunist Manifesto:

Society confronts the simple fact that when everyone can possess every intellectual work of beauty and utility—reaping all the human value of every increase of knowledge—at the same cost that any one person can possess them, it is no longer moral to exclude.

Essentially, this argues that the unethical position is the one that creates the false scarcity.

Another less extreme position would be that many countries allow for exemptions for format shifting: if you buy a CD with some music, you’re legally permitted to rip it so long as you don’t distribute copies. One could argue that someone in your position is operating within the spirit of these laws… provided that you haven’t torrented the videos since that necessarily includes some partial distribution.

Finally, the least generous interpretation would point out that you didn’t buy the videos in the first place, but rather a licence to let Vudu stream them to you. Given that you don’t own anything, you’re not morally entitled to own it in a different format. This is why many people have rejected the streaming model.

As someone in camp #1, I think you’re a-ok ethically, but I thought you might want a broader perspective.

I’ve never seen a more flawless answer
Very nicely summarized!
It’s never wrong to pirate movies.
Super illegal. Straight to super jail.
Life on the outside ain’t what it used to be…