He removed individual blocked (which didnt block users from the service)... the ability to block users from the service entierly is still done on twitter and as such it doesnt violate this particular requirement.
@freemo @jens I'm being facetious, in reference to the story linked below.
If you have the technical capacity to block abusive users, but your owner won't let you, then do you *really* have the "ability" to block them? OK, the serious answer is "yes," but it's a pretty significant caveat and I hope Apple is paying attention.
I think you misunderstood something…
If you have the technical capacity to block abusive users, but your owner won’t let you, then do you really have the “ability”
Thats not what is going on here… The apple policy states that the owners of the platform (musk and twitter employees) must have the ability to block abusive users from the service. It makes no requirement that individual users need to be able to block.
So no you neither have the technical capacity nor will the owner let you… but neither of those has any relevance to the apple policy as it is not talking about that.
@jens so will #Apple again bow before #Money and refuse to enforce their own #rules before #ApartheidEmeraldBoy / #SpaceKaren?
Like with the #AppName...???
Cheering too early: As @[email protected] correctly pointed out, Musk "only" removed individual blocks (which in fact never locked out bad actors from the whole service), while the ability to cut users from the platform entirely remains (for Twitter/X). It seems as this most likely doesn't violate the App Store guidelines, unfortunately. https://coma.social/@jens/110911925589875248