a perfect case in point for #UBI (Universal Basic income)
@tshepang
I would need to give this idea some more thought.
You see, if a service does not cost anything at all, there tends to be waste and abuse.
If everyone is given a basic income to cover their (basic) needs, this would solve that problem too, don't you think?
In any event, public goods should be held by a (non-corrupt) state and not by private citizens or corporations (e.g. water rights).
(1/n)
Very interesting. You thought of corruption by administrators (and rightly so, see my posts, e.g., about Nestlรฉ and water-rights abuses, e.g., in the US and elsewhere.)
I thought more of abuse by citizens. People tend to value services that are free of charge low.
Regarding the showcase of #Scandinavian countries, they cannot be the benchmark. I'm no #anthropologist but I'd suspect that the following factors influence this result:
1) relatively...
@HistoPol @jsbarretto give people a free service, take it away, and see the reaction... the fight that will ensue will show just how much they value such.
Abuse may exist, but that is no reason to have others suffer. UBI is kool, but may not be enough to cover essential things like medical (in the US, but also elsewhere, to a lesser extent) and housing costs.