I guess it's great that 46% of scientists have joined other social-media platforms following Twitters self-destruction (though lol, for LinkedIn being the 2nd most frequently joined one šŸ˜‚). But only 7% have stopped using Twitter altogether? That's quite depressing!

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02554-0

Thousands of scientists are cutting back on Twitter, seeding angst and uncertainty

A Nature survey reveals scientists’ reasons for leaving the social-media platform now known as X, and what they are doing to build and maintain a sense of community.

@gedankenstuecke Especially for organizations it is a slow process and then it becomes a šŸ“šŸ£problem. But e.g. just back from an ELIXIR call: There are at least plans…
@mbaudis yeah, though I’d argue exactly no one is on any social media to primarily follow institutional accounts. It’s a nice-have if they are there, but I doubt there’s a lot of people that would say ā€œif only academic institution/organization X was on this I’d make an accountā€.
@gedankenstuecke That’s mixed; you’re obv. not interested in your own institutions (we have enough channels for that, thank you very much); the more distant ones may deliver interesting pointers. BUT it is good to get tracked / amplified by your own affiliations.
@mbaudis I don't know, maybe for comparatively small institutions that's the case, but the larger/more established places virtually all just use social media as a way to push their press releases et al.