Hexbear federation megathread

https://lemm.ee/post/4543536

Hexbear federation megathread - lemm.ee

# Hey folks I have been receiving a lot of messages every single day about federation with hexbear. Some of our users are vehemently against it, others are in full support. The conversation does not seem to be dying down, rather, the volume of messages I receive about it seems to be increasing, so I am opening this public space where we can openly discuss the topic. I am going to write a wall of text about my own thoughts on the situation, I’m sorry, but no tl;dr this time, and I ask anybody participating in this thread to first read through this post before commenting. Before I go any further, I want to be clear that for anybody who participates here, it is required to focus on the quality of your posts. That means: * Be kind to each other, even if you disagree * Use arguments rather than calling people names * Realize that this is a divisive topic, so your comments should be even more thoughtful than usual With that out of the way, there are a few things I want to cover. ### On defederation in general First of all, I am a firm believer that defederation must be reserved only for cases where all other methods have failed. If defederation is used liberally, then a small group of malicious users can effectively completely shut down the federated network, by simply creating the type of drama between instances which would inevitably result in defederation. In my view, federation is the biggest strength of Lemmy compared to any centralized discussion forum, so naturally I think maintaining federation by default is an important goal in general. I am also a believer in the value of deplatforming hateful content, but I think defederation is not the best way to do this. Banning individual users, banning communities and establishing a culture of mutual support between mods and admins of different instances should be the first line of defense against such content. There are some further steps that can be taken before defederation as well, but these are not really documented anywhere (in order to prevent circumvention). The point is: for myself, defederation is the absolute last resort, only to be used when it is completely clear that other methods are ineffective. Finally, I am wary of creating a false expectation among lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] users that lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] admins endorse all users and communities and content on instances we are federated with. Here at lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee], we use a blocklist for federation, which means our default apporach is to federate with all new instances. We do not have the resources (manpower, skills and knowledge) necessary to pass judgement on all instances which exist out there, as a result, users on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] are expected to curate their own content to quite a high degree. In addition to downvoting and/or reporting as necessary, individual lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] users are also able to block specific users and communities, and the ability to block entire instances is coming very soon as well. Having said all that, in a situation where all other methods do indeed fail, defederation is not out of the question. Making such a call is up to the discretion of lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] admins, and doing it as a last resort is completely in line with our federation policy. ### Regarding hexbear Hexbear is an established Lemmy instance, focused on many flavors of leftism. They have quite a large userbase who are very active on Lemmy (often so active that they leave the impression brigading all popular Lemmy posts). One important thing to note is that while some forms of bigotry seem to be quite accepted by many hexbear users (but seemingly not by mods - more on that below), they at least are very protective of LGBT rights (and yes, I am quite certain that they are not just pretending to do this, as many users seem to believe). Additionally, while I have noticed quite high quality posts from hexbear users, there are also several users there who seem to really enjoy trolling and baiting (very reminiscent of 4chan-type “for the lulz” posting), and it’s important to note that this kind of posting is in general allowed on hexbear itself. The reason this whole topic is important to so many people right now (despite hexbear being a relatively old instance), is that hexbear only recently enabled federation. A combination of their volume of posts, their strong convictions, the excitement about federation, and the aforementioned trolling has made them very visible to almost all Lemmy users, and this has sparked discussions about the value of federation with hexbear on a lot of Lemmy instances. #### My own experience with hexbear I want to write down my own experience with interacting with hexbear users, mods, and admins over the past few days. I believe this experience will highlight why I am hesitant to advocate for immediate full defederation from hexbear at this point in time, and am for now still more in favor of taking action on a more individual user basis. Please read and see how you feel about the situation afterwards. ##### Background My first real contact with hexbear users was in the comments section of a post in this meta community requesting defederation from hexbear [https://lemm.ee/post/4287105] by @[email protected]. That post is now locked, because several hexbear users very quickly started doing the aforementioned “for the lulz” type spamming of meme images in the comments (these are actually just emojis, but they are rendered as full-size images on all instances other than the source instance, due to a current Lemmy bug). I did not want to take further actions in that thread in general (for archival purposes), but I did take one action, which in retrospect was a mistake: I removed a comment which contained the hammer and sickle symbol. I ignorantly associated this symbolism with Kremlin propaganda, and the atrocities my own people suffered at the hands of the soviet union during the previous century. Many users (including hexbear users) correctly (and politely) pointed out to me in DMs that the symbol has a much broader use than just as the symbol of the USSR, and people elsewhere in the world may not associate it with the USSR at all. I am grateful for users who pointed this out to me without resorting to personal attacks. Let me be clear here: while I do not have anything against leftism or communist ideas in general (in fact in today’s world, I think discussion of such ideas is quite necessary), Kremlin propaganda has no place on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee]. Any dehumanizing talking points of the Kremlin on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] are treated as any other bigotry, and if communist symbolism is used in context of Kremlin propaganda (that is the context in which I have been exposed to it throughout my whole life), then it will still be removed. But there is no blanket ban on communist symbolism in general on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee], and discussing and advocating for leftist and communist topics (as distinct from the imperialist and dehumanizing policies of the Kremlin) is certainly allowed on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee]. ##### Hexbear user response Coming back to the events of the past few days: soon after my removal of the comment containing the symbol from the meta thread, two posts popped up on hexbear. One was focused on insulting and spreading lies about me personally. Another was focused on diminishing the horrors of the soviet occupation in my country. In the comments under both of these posts (and in a few other threads on hexbear), I noticed some seriously disturbing bigotry against my people. There were comments which reflected the anti-Estonian propaganda of the current Russian state, things like: * Suggesting that my people has no right to exist * Stating that my people (and other Baltic nations) are subhuman * Claiming that anybody critical of both nazi and soviet occupations is themselves a nazi and a holocaust denier I expect to hear such statements from the Russian state - here in Estonia, we are subjected to this and other kinds of bigotry constantly from Russian media - but to see it spread openly in non-Russian channels is extremely disturbing. Such bigotry is completely against lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] rules in general. Additionally, my identity is public information, because I feel it’s important for the integrity of lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] that I don’t hide behind anonymity. Considering this, I’m sure you can understand why I am very worried about my own safety when people leave comments in many unrelated threads (where my original posts are not even visible), baselessly calling me a nazi and a holocaust denier. Note that the goal of this post is not to start a new debate in the comments about the the repressions of the soviet union in Estonia or other occupied territories, but if the topic interests any users, I can recommend the 2006 documentary The Singing Revolution (imdb [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0954008]). The trailer is a bit cheesy, but the actual film contains lots of historical footage from the soviet occupation, and also many interviews with people who experienced it, who share stories which are deeply familiar to all Estonians. If anybody is interested in further discussion, then I suggest making a post about it in the Estonian community here: [email protected] [/c/[email protected]]. ##### Hexbear admin response After the above events had played out, I reached out to hexbear admins for clarification on their moderation policies and how they handle such cases. I was actually very happy with their response: 1. They immediately removed the personal attacks and dehumanizing comments containing Kremlin propaganda from Hexbear, and assured me that such content is always handled by mods 2. They told me that while there are all kinds of leftists on hexbear, Russian disinformation is generally either refuted in comments or removed by mods 3. They implemented some additional rules on hexbear to try and reduce the trolling experienced by many other instances, including ours: https://hexbear.net/post/352119 [https://hexbear.net/post/352119] ##### My personal take-aways Let me play the devil’s advocate here and employ some “self-whataboutism”: among all users that have been banned on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] for bigotry, the majority were actually not users from other instances, and in fact people with lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] accounts. If we judge any larger instance only by bigoted posts that some of its users make, then we might as well declare all instances as cesspools and close down Lemmy completely. I believe it’s far more useful to judge instances based on moderation in response to such content. Just as we remove bigoted content from lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee], I have also witnessed bigoted content being removed from hexbear. At the same time, I am aware of some internal conflict between hexbear users over the more strict moderation they are now starting to employ, and I am definitely keeping an eye on that situation and how admins handle it. I am also still quite worried about the amount of distinct users on hexbear who have posted Kremlin propaganda. I so far don’t have reason to believe that these users are employed by the Russian state, but the fact that they are spreading the same hateful content which can be seen on Russian television seems problematic to say the least, and it remains to be seen if moderators can truly keep up with such content. ### Where thing stand right now I am not convinced that we are currently at a point where the “last resort” of defederation is necessary. This is based on the presumption that our moderation workload at lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] will not get out of hand just due to users from that particular instance. My current expectation is that as the excitement of federation calms down (and as new rules on hexbear go into effect), the currently relatively high volume of low effort trolling will be replaced by more thoughtful posts. If this is not the case then we will certainly need to re-evaluate things. Additionally, nothing is changing about our own rules regarding bigotry. Especially relevant in the context of Kremlin propaganda, I want to say that dehumanizing anybody is not allowed on lemm.ee [http://lemm.ee] (hopefully I do not have to spell it out, but this of course includes Ukrainians, LGBT folks, and others that the Kremlin despises), and action will be taken against any users who do this, regardless of what instance they are posting from. Finally, I am very interested to hear thoughts and responses from our own users. I am super grateful to anybody who actually took the time to read through this massive dump of my own thoughts, and I am very interested to get a proper understanding of how our users feel about what I’ve written here. Please share any thoughts in the comments.

Stating that my people (and other Baltic nations) are subhuman

As a member of Hexbear for 3+ years I just want to say that this isn’t acceptable over here and would land people with a very serious reprimand or a permaban if they don’t admit to being in the wrong for this. The use of “subhuman” in particular is fascist behaviour and I’d assume it is wreckers rather than longstanding members, it’s not language that socialists are fond of.

The use of “subhuman” in particular is fascist behaviour and I’d assume it is wreckers rather than longstanding members, it’s not language that socialists are fond of.

That’s not true at all. Look at any post about landlords or Zelenskyy or “bourgeoisie”. Count the number of pictures or references to guillotines.

I’ve already personally blocked the whole instance because it’s not worth arguing with people over and over.

Is there a way to block instances as a user now?
On the Connect app there is
Soon™ It is being worked on.
What’s the GitHub issue for it?
Allow a user to block an instance · Issue #2397 · LemmyNet/lemmy

For front end issues, use lemmy-ui Is your proposal related to a problem? When looking at the "all" feed and even sorting by "top week" , it is basically all communist propaganda/advocacy ,obviousl...

GitHub

Landlords/Bourgeoisie are not ethnicities.

And Guillotines are not even Socialist references, they reference perhaps the most important part in late medieval European history.

Putins head should be stuck inside one and saying that doesn’t dehumanise anyone.

Agreeing with something a ukraine flag pfp says? Truly the world has gone mad.
This isn’t appropriate for this post, the OP asked that conversation stays on topic

Putins head should be stuck inside one and saying that doesn’t dehumanise anyone.

spoiler

Guillotines […] reference perhaps the most important part in late medieval European history

The guillotine is best known for its use in France, particularly during the French Revolution. The French revolution was late 18th century, long after the Middle Ages had ended.

Guillotine - Wikipedia

And Guillotines are not even Socialist references, they reference perhaps the most important part in late medieval European history.

Not only are you wrong on calling it medieval as stated by others, but you’re also wrong about saying it has nothing to do with Socialism. The French Revolution, the Paris Commune (name rings a bell?) and Robespierre are major references of the European left culture.

Paris Commune (1789–1795) - Wikipedia

There is a difference between calling someone subhuman which is the rhetoric of people that believe that various races of humanity are more human than others vs calls to eat the rich through the use of guillotine memes. The latter is just radical and militant activism. The former is fascist rhetoric. The latter also has a place in mainstream society already as a tool of art.
Chop chop: the liberatory militancy of guillotine memes

Guillotine memes, as a form of imaginative militant discourse, encompass new cultural and political possibilities for anti-authoritarian organizing in the US.

ROAR Magazine
The fact that you’re here in our meta thread for our users to discuss the situation arguing the really doesn’t help with the image of Hexbear users brigading other communities.
I was already having a conversation with Sun when he made the post. Which is why I was one of the first here.

I can literally see the post on my feed. It’s not brigading.

Also the admin hasn’t said that this is an exclusive thread for lemm.ee users so we have the right to defend ourselves against accusations some of which are false.

I would be upset if people in our instance started spamming random shit here with no intention to engage in a conversation and agree that they should be reprimanded by the servers admins/mods.

It said in the post to read the admins whole message, and to only participate earnestly/ not be rude and stay on topic

So, we are. Why is that an issue?

there have been half a dozen hex users in this comment section so this accusation doesnt feel warranted
This is on the front page of chapo.chat/Hexbear.net. Isn’t the whole deal w/ federation that the communities merge their posts and their commenters? I apologise if I am misunderstanding. Personally I just comment on whatever things I think are worth commenting on regardless of what community it’s on as I think my comments never violate any particular rules anyhow. It’s not brigading it’s just people wanting to comment on what’s in front of them and directly referring to them, IMO. I understand how it would feel that way when it has come so suddenly, though. It’s just what happens when an old and active group suddenly joins a bunch of smaller and/or less active ones (or, at least, larger to a small enough extent that the new commenters are still noticeable).

there are more of us and we post more than you, thats it

It’s like moving to hawaii and being surprised to run into so many beaches

You should see how we are when we’re at each others throats, then you’d know how mellow this turnout is comparatively

But its a post about them and there’s no request in the post for hexbear users to refrain from commenting, why shouldn’t they comment?

this comment was made yesterday, when there actually was only half a dozen hex users commenting

at this point hex users massively outnumber lemm.ee users in this comment section, and while i dont think users are actively brigading lemm.ee the way they were brigading blahaj, its extremely overwhelming regardless and i see why folks want to defederate from them

i dont blame them for responding, but i also dont blame other folks for being entirely exhausted with a dozen of them being ready to respond to any comment, especially because of how widespread of a phenomenon its been and how hostile hex users have been in some of the posts theyve overwhelmed

Lols, people will literally think you’re one of them too mate. You have your pronouns there. I was confused for a second when I saw your complaint.
i liked the initiative and reasoning and wouldnt mind it being normalised on the fediverse at large, as opposed to just hexbear
If you’re going to cry about “brigading” like a redditor then you don’t understand what federation is and should go back to reddit.
It appears posting memes about assassinating people for ideology is something that both extreme left and extreme right tend to do, and that’s something that non-extreme people, unsurprisingly, don’t seem to be fond of.
What are you talking about? Liberals post about the people they want to die all the time, you’ve just normalised them. Go mention homeless people in the San Francisco subreddit and watch all the liberals turn into hitler in seconds. Don’t get me started on what happens when you mention Roma people to european liberals.
Don’t liberals love to joke about wanting political assassination? See any comment section about Putin for example.
In the case of Putin it would be in the hope of stopping it’s invasion war. It’s similar to wanting to assassinate Hitler during WWII, I don’t think you would oppose that.
If you mean assassinating or letting die the lower classes, that would a very small percentage of liberal extremists, similarly to right and left extremists.
Ehh, people also were calling to nuke Moscow. I’m simply saying that centrist ideology doesn’t make someone not call for killing
I don’t believe the average moderate person would call to nuke Moscow.

Awoo has already noted some important refutations, but I want to unpack something here.

Landlords and Bourgeoisie are class identities. Importantly, these are not the result of things outside of your control (i.e. ethnic origin, nation, etc.) but instead determined by actions in the world. While one can’t say that one is subhuman because of where they are from, isn’t being a landlord (and thus extracting rent from people for shelter) a behavior? A series of actions and choices? And can’t we characterize a behavior or action as evil/immoral? Basically, when I say “landlords are evil and deserve to die or surrender their assets to the collective” what I’m describing is a particular set of actions. It’s not different from having an opinion on if murderers deserve capital punishment.

Btw, I believe in rehabilitative punishment. However, if we’re going to talk about people who deserve to die, I think capitalists and landlords are up there. A person who kills someone else – either due to mental illness or a crime of passion – is far less damaging to our social fabric than people who, through institutions, contribute to the death of our world and the immiseration of many. For instance, how many unhoused people have gone hungry/died because of the executives at Starbucks who decide that food thrown out should be covered in coffee grounds to be inedible? We don’t have the numbers, but shouldn’t we call this behavior subhuman/evil? I think you’re missing the distinction between saying the executive who designed that policy deserves the gulag – a specific inhuman action that deserves a specific response – and calling all insert ethnicity/nationality here subhuman.

Starbucks barista documents coffee chain’s alleged food waste in viral video: ‘Made me feel sick’

‘This should be illegal,’ one viewer claims

The Independent

This is the kind of thing I really hate to see. It’s the reason I’m going to be leaving. You guys make a blanket statement like all landlords are evil because they extract rent for shelter. You don’t give any further reasoning. I’m sure you’ve collectively decided that through some illogical conversations on your home instance but you fail to make a valid point in the wild.

For example:

where are you expecting people to live?

These homes are owned by someone- they worked/paid/built them themselves.

Why do you think these people who have toiled for 40+years should just give you there invested money/work for free?

Why are they evil for using something they have worked for to help themselves?

Inevitably someone like you comes along and just shitposts this same rhetoric you just did with no logical backing behind it other than “evil landlords must die and be redistributed”

How is a house different from a farm? Or a rail system? Or a *insert anything created by someone and used for personal gain"?

Why do you think these people who have toiled for 40+years should just give you there invested money/work for free?

Amazing logic. I worked so hard to buy this minigun, surely it’s perfectly ok to unload it into a crowd. Don’t tell me what to do with MY money!

Your post is far better than mine comrade. Much funnier example.
This is the following each other around bit.
Yeah, I just had to give props though, it’s such a good example, way better than my lame one t.t
Should I accuse you of following lemm.ee users around when you respond to ones comment? This is such a weird take… there are a ton of hexbear users, and this thread is literally about them. Why wouldn’t they post here? Why wouldn’t they respond to each other? To accuse every hexbear user of brigadeering seems a bit over-the-top to me when they are the subject matter we’re discussing

What? I’m saing you guys just follow each other around upvoting/commenting purely on the basis of “comradeship” regardless of how stupid the take is. Literally the guy tried to strawman the discussion into somethig about shooting a mini gun into people and immediately there’s you guys up voting hum.

This is pretty classic hexbear and comrade community behavior in my short time on lemmy.

Why are you “you guys” ing me? Look again, I’m on sh.itjust.works. I’m not a hexbear. You seem like you need to chill, friend. You’re coming across like you have an agenda against hexbear honestly.

Because of what you said bud. Not to mention how dumb of a take the original guy took. It’s literally the point I was making.

You making an alt on another instance is not proof of anything.

Oh yeah I’m on my alt lol, where I post daily and regularly post and maintain my community? Yeah this is clearly my alt 🙄 You gotta chill with the paranoia, “buddy”. Kinda proving me right with these assumptions
Oh yeah Totally. No really.
Buddy, you have less activity on your account then I have had in half the time, and I’m not over here accusing you of being an explodingheads troll, ya big weirdo. But if eVeRyOnE i DoNt lIkE Is HeXbEaR is how you wanna spend your time on here, have at it. Keep letting them live rent free in your head

Uh. Ok. Point of pride for you I guess?

Literally no loss for me if you stop commenting.

This is the strawmannung I referenced earlier. Goodjob being true to your roots.
This is the strawmanning I referenced earlier. Goodjob being true to your roots.
It would be strawmanning if here was a point to make. But here was only only a bunch of cliches to make fun of.

If someone’s living in their own home, I don’t have a problem with that at all. The problem is purchasing a home just to extract rents and profits.

And btw, I think all those things should be collectivized and socially available. Landlords contribute no value (as shown by their unwillingness to do maintenance/repairs), and merely extract. After all, what really is the benefit, to society, of a landlord? They serve no purpose (hell, even a CEO has more purpose than a landlord, and they – as Elon shows – don’t really contribute much either). It’s entirely extractive. Your “why are they evil for using something they have worked for to help themselves” is because of how they’re using it. Just like how if you own a gun and defend your home, we consider that moral, but if you own a gun and shoot a person on the street, we consider it immoral. If you build a house and live in it, that’s moral and fine(though, in a perfect world, this would be produced through the government/taxes rather than individual accumulation, but we’re not talking about utopia, we’re talking about moral judgments on our world as it exists). If you build a house or purchase a house, then use it to extract ever-increasing rents from people for a thing we require to live (shelter), that’s immoral.

I think it’s a pretty simple distinction actually.

To return to the starbucks example, the company “produced” that material. Is it “moral” of them to throw it away rather than donate it? After all, they made it - just like your example of houses.

Finally, I’ll just note, the very idea of private property when applied to land, etc. is odious to me on philosophical grounds.

Jake on The Law - Adventure Time

YouTube

So your argument clearly states that we are living in capitalism… and at the same time states that your moral problem is one of idealism/communism. Your argument cannot exist in one and then transmute half way through to make it fit your narrative.

We live in capitalism. I have worked and saved to buy off my house which I now rent out at market (below market actually) and provide a home that my tenants could not afford to buy on their own. I haven’t increased rent since I started renting.

You are now blanket yelling I should be stripped of my investment. My effort. My money that I’ve worked for. And these other slack-jaws are frothing at the mouth because they can’t conceive of a difference between me and the multibillion dollar company who is actually doing what you are saying.

a home that my tenants could not afford to buy on their own

What I’m saying is there shouldn’t be a situation like this in the first place. Your tenants shouldn’t have to come to you to rent, housing should be freely available to all.

It’s a difference of degree, not of kind. And the goal is to change the relationship to society/production/the state such that this relationship no longer needs to exist. After all, investing in housing/real estate is the one “safe” thing to do under capitalism if you have surplus money. I doubt you’re a true “capitalist” in the sense of having true economic leverage, and the question for you is ultimately, would you side with the workers, your tenants, etc. and willingly join in the socialization of basic human needs? Or will you ally with the capitalists above you and protect private property at all costs.

A difference in degree but not in kind exists historically. Guatemala. The operations of the United Fruit company through exploitation were very profitable. They “built” them. The new government offered to either buy them out at the rate they had claimed on their taxes or reassess their taxes to redistribute their profits more equitably. Instead, the CIA coup’d them.

The question for you ultimately is, if given the chance to exit from the exploitative relationship imposed upon you by capitalism, will you? Would you let the government buy you out or raise your taxes to fund collective housing? Or will you instead employ the forces of reaction?

1954 Guatemalan coup d'état - Wikipedia

Then fucking say THAT. Not all landlords are evil. I’d be willing to bet 90% of these frothing loons don’t realize why you are trying to accomplish and are just riding the hate train.

He’ll yeah I’m all for more taxes to pay for healthcare/education/collective housing. Hell no am I ok with just giving my shit away because you happen to think I should. Sure- pay me for my investments at fair market value- and I’ll just go an reinvest in something else that you guys will inevitably think should belong to all.

I did note later in another thread, a comrade had a good revision. The relationship is evil, not the actual person. Here’s what was said:

I’d categorize the parasitic relationship as evil, but as for judging individual people for the poverty and homelessness caused by that relationship, it’s more complicated as we live under capitalism.

Again, I’ve got some salt because my landlord kicked me out last year just because he couldn’t extract enough profit from me. Needless to say, his anger at basic tenant protections has stuck in my craw ever since.

where are you expecting people to live?

In houses. There’s dozens of vacant homes for every homeless person. Just as capitalism requires some people be hungry to maximize profit of food, it requires some people be homeless to maximize profit of landlords.

These homes are owned by someone- they worked/paid/built them themselves.

The people who build houses deserve to be compensated for their labor. Owning a house on the other hand, is not labor.

Why do you think these people who have toiled for 40+years should just give you there invested money/work for free?

Rent isn’t compensation for the construction of a home, otherwise the renter would own the home after 20 years of renting paid off the mortgage.

Why are they evil for using something they have worked for to help themselves?

I’d categorize the parasitic relationship as evil, but as for judging individual people for the poverty and homelessness caused by that relationship, it’s more complicated as we live under capitalism.

Inevitably someone like you comes along and just shitposts this same rhetoric you just did with no logical backing behind it other than “evil landlords must die and be redistributed”

Are you talking about the description of the cultural revolution in that one province in China people post? In the context of generations of peasants seeing their children die of starvation-related disease or conscripted never to return, the people were more merciful and practical than just. It’s easy to criticize any change if you ignore the violence of the status quo. To quote Mark Twain:

THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

How is a house different from a farm? Or a rail system? Or a insert anything created by someone and used for personal gain?

It’s not.

My partner and I should have a 50 percent equity in the apartment she rented for 10 years. Instead we were unceremoniously kicked out last year because the landlord’s son wanted to make more money.
What in the world makes you think you deserve 50% equity? Did you pay half the down payment? Did you pay half the mortgage and interest to the bank? Did you pay half the property taxes? Did you pay half the maintenance? Did you make any agreement woth the owner up front that this is what you would get? No? Did someone mention communism to you and you haven’t thought twice since?

The amount it appreciated while we were paying the rent that whole time is how I got that 50 percent. Also, the property actually tripled in value 100k to 300k.

The total maintenance the owner did over the entire time we were there was 1000 dollars. One month’s rent. Add painting and new carpet, ok, that’s like 5k? We paid more than 100k in rent over that time.

It was pure profit extraction. The owner actually sent us the numbers to justify kicking us out. , His mother made more than him because of property tax, but after reassessing property taxes, he would have _only_been making 300 a month profit off of us. That’s pure profit after everything. He was mad he couldn’t raise our rent by 500 dollars all at once and instead had to do it yearly.