And no, we don't have the "tools."
- pharma companies will be charging 4-5 times more for the new boosters
- we haven't sufficiently funded next gen vaccines that are better at reducing transmission
- we don't provide free N95s and we haven't educated people enough about respiratory protection
- we don't have regulations for clean indoor air and haven't sufficiently invested in it
- we haven't sufficiently invested in treatments for Long COVID, or engaged in a mass public infor campaign
@luckytran
"we have the tools" is like the old joke about the mathematician waking up to a fire, noting that there's a bucket of water available, and going back to sleep
we do have the tools, we're not using them 😢
I mean...just to expand on this a little. We do *not* actually have the tools. At least not to treat Covid. What we do have is Paxlovid. That is literally IT. And even that (IF you get a prescription for it) only lowers your chances of getting LC by around 25%. Lots of people take it and STILL get LC. This is not even getting into things like long term organ damage of which we don't know whether Paxlovid helps or not at all, or people with severe lactose intolerance (like myself) being all but unable to take Paxlovid (because it contains a lot of lactose).
We DO have the tools to prevent infection however. Those are the ones we chose not to use because they are too inconvenient for us basically, so we chose mass infection over that. It's easier. Speaking purely from a population standpoint. There are more systemic reasons as well why authorities are not propagating infection control measures.
All around, a sad, sorry state of affairs.
@GreySkies @luckytran
Exactly, we have the tools to prevent infection; we even got a new one a month or two ago, ASHRAE 241
We have existing laws mandating their use, by and large (OH&S)
We're just ignoring the tools and the laws; and also the infection, reinfection, disability and death