Trump tells Georgia witness not to testify

https://lemmy.world/post/3184600

Trump tells Georgia witness not to testify - Lemmy.world

Former President Trump on Monday appeared to warn former Georgia lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan against testifying before the Fulton County grand jury in the state’s 2020 election probe. Driving the news: “I am reading reports that failed former Lt. Governor of Georgia, Jeff Duncan, will be testifying before the Fulton County Grand Jury,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account on Monday. - “He shouldn’t. I barely know him but he was, right from the beginning of this Witch Hunt, a nasty disaster for those looking into the Election Fraud that took place in Georgia.” - Duncan, who criticized Trump’s false election fraud claims in 2020, said Saturday that he had been told to appear Tuesday before the Fulton County grand jury. - “Republicans should never let honesty be mistaken for weakness,” he wrote in a post on X. What’s next: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis appears poised to issue a charging decision on Trump’s alleged efforts to subvert election results. The big picture: Trump’s Monday Truth Social post comes days after the judge overseeing a separate trial — the federal probe into his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election — warned against making “inflammatory statements” that could intimidate witnesses in that trial. - U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan said during a Friday hearing that any appearance of witness tampering would increase the need for a speedy trial. - Trump already faces three criminal trials: In D.C. over efforts to overturn the 2020 election, in Florida over his retention of classified documents and in New York over an alleged hush money payment.

Just throw him away, please.
I’m just so tired of him. Who wants more of this bullshit?
90% of white evangelicals in America to start with.
I see the phone timeout is working.

This is him attempting to call the judge’s bluff. Following the order, he also posted calling the judge biased. He’s exploring to see if the judge will let him get away with it. He’ll slowly ramp up the posts until the judge tells him to cut it out again, and then he’ll know where the line is.

He believes the judge is afraid to hold him in contempt, and thus far he has been correct. But this is a direct violation of the judge’s order, and the judge shouldn’t let it slide. If she treats this with leniency, he’ll only take it as tacit approval and continue getting more inflammatory. The only reason I can see for the judge allowing it to continue is to give him more rope to hang himself with. One violation of the order is bad, but if she lets it continue and he racks up a bunch of evidence, she may have better justification to hold him and expedite the trial.

Different case. (Can we pause for a moment to recognize how bonkers it is that a former president has so many criminal cases either in process or pending that it’s getting hard to keep track?)

The judge who ordered him not to engage in any witness tampering is overseeing the federal case against him for trying to overturn the election in 2020. In this particular instance, he appears to have threatened a witness in the Fulton County, Georgia case, for which an indictment is expected soon.

Would it make a difference? Threatening a witness in one trial when you have several others ongoing and in such a public fashion would have a chilling effect on witness testimony for all trails, or so I would think.

It might. I’m no lawyer, but it’s conceivable that the order will be interpreted as targeted specifically to witnesses in the federal trial.

That said, threatening people is illegal all on its own, so who knows…

1729. Protection Of Government Processes -- Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants -- 18 U.S.C. 1512

This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. The information here may be outdated and links may no longer function. Please contact [email protected] if you have any questions about the archive site.

I was testing mastodon with this post. Success.

That said, threatening people is illegal all on its own, so who knows…

Not necessarily. If it's just a political threat, that's fine. And like a lot of what Trump says, this is just borderline enough to not explicitly threaten physical violence to the point of criminality. It really needs the witness tampering to become criminal. If he says that he will cause political consequences if Jeff Duncan testifies, that would let the prosecution slap witness tampering on to the rest of the case. Hell, he could be convicted on that alone.

That charge is already on the docket.
Right, my point was that his threats were not criminal due to being political threats alone, but due to being associated with testifying.
I hate to say it, but Trump is correct: he could literally murder the judge in this (or any) case on live TV and get away with it. why? because they let him. they refuse to hold him accountable for anything, and that’s why he keeps doing this shit— and getting away with it.
And lets stop pretending that any level of discourse is going to reach the remaining trump cult, we could literally have a video of his raping their own mothers now and they would still vote for him, so its time to give up on those people they are never coming back no matter how much evidence we have or how many charges there are.

we could literally have a video of him raping their mothers and they would still vote for him

They would. They would call the video ‘fake news’ and find it easier to assume their mother was lying than admit their false prophet is capable of any wrongdoing. They’ve built their entire identities around their unwavering confirmation bias.

Its worse that that, they would consider it an honor that trump chose to rape the women in their family. Its koolaide time and we all know its coming

MAGA cultists: Our moms should be honored that Trump likes them!

Also MAGA cultists: Dems caused our moms to get raped!

And of course trump is sooo incredible STUpid that he doesnt know how to use the phrase, 'one more than we need' instead he says 'one more than we have', which insinuates that he has only 11779 votes to begin with!!! GAWD HES SO DUMB!!!

And if they had given him 11780 votes for some reason, he would then be 1 vote ahead of Biden in that race which would have triggered and automatic recount. Man if your going to ask people find votes for you, ASK FOR LIKE 20,000 IDIOT!!!

This user election frauds
I believe under U.S. Law they have to arrest him again and post no bail. This is a blatant disregard for the law. To not act is an injustice to the history of common law going back 800+ years.
I can’t even tell if you’re joking. hat’s how much of a shitshow joke our justice system has become.
Not joking, it goes back to the Magna Carta and the origins of common law. In fact it is Clause 39 of the Great Charter of June 1215 CE and a case before Pope Innocent III and ordeals of fire and water. It’s interesting but it is the origin of jury trials and witness tampering laws.
great. now I’m sad.
Ok but the Magna Carta isn’t really a thing over here, and I’m sure the common law precedents for witness/jury tampering have been superceded by new legislation.
He could walk into court fully erect shouting “Yes! I did it motherfuckers, I am guilty, I am death!” and the judge would still let him roll up in her crib, take a shit, dress up like Santa and take pictures with her kids.
its Jesse “He can’t keep getting away with this!” but in real life

I don’t know that I’d attribute any actual strategy to this.

I think that’s a mistake that everyone had made about Trump from the beginning.

“Oh, he’s a marketing genius!”

Why? Because he put his name on everything? Maybe there’s a simple explanation: he’s a raging narcissist who likes putting his name on everything. The fact that his name is synonymous with being the top, or besting something is just his sheer dumb luck.

The fact is, every single thing he’s ever done can be explained as being an expression of his narcissism and impulse control problems, combined with the fact that he faces zero consequences for his behavior no matter how awful.

So, no, I don’t think he was testing the judge. I think he was just mindlessly attacking anyone who is a threat to him like he has always done in every situation.

His grandfather changed the family name from Drumpf to Trump, so his family chose to name themselves as 'on top' intentionally. He just inherited the narcissism.
It’s sad, really because if ever there was a person to match the sound “Drumpf”, it’s that sack of shit.

That kind of anglicization was very common for immigrants of all types a century ago. Like my own g’g’grandmother.

There are plenty of reasons to dislike that whole family, that’s not one I hold against them, or anybody else for that matter.

The man thinks that getting locked up helps him, and that it will fundraise for him. He’s delusional to think that he’ll magically be elected next year and then pardon himself and walk out of jail.

This is for the Georgia case which hasn’t gone to a judge yet, he’s just trying to get ahead of things before he gets a gag order here too… which this will be used as evidence for…

But you’re right, there’s enough going on that it’s hard to tell the players without a program, so I made this:

This seemed to be popular information when I posted it (ahem) “elsewhere”. Thought it might be welcome to have here.

If you’re trying to keep track of where we’re at in the Trump prosecutions:

Updated 8/10/2023

Washington, D.C. - 4 felonies, January 6th Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
(DOJ lawyer Jack Smith has requested a trial date of 1/2/2024, Trump lawyers have yet to supply a counter date. The judge will announce a final date on 8/28)
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

Georgia - Election Interference
Investigation <- You Are Here
2 new grand juries impaneled 7/11/2023.
Indictment - July 11th to September 1st.
(Grand Jury work expected July 31 to Aug. 18)
(Streets around the Fulton County courthouse will be closed from 8/7 to 8/18.)
Arrest
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

New York State - 34 felonies, Stormy Daniels Payoff
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - March 25th, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Florida - 40 felonies, Federal documents charges
Investigation
Indictment
Original indictment was for 37 felonies.
3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - May 20, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again resulting in a demand for $10 million is not listed as it’s a civil case and not a crimimal one.

2 more indictments and he gets a free sub.
One prison term and he gets free footlongs for life. 😯

The only reason I can see for the judge allowing it to continue is to give him more rope to hang himself with.

How much rope does one man get? He has already been given the entire rope store, distribution center, and manufacturing plant. He has so much rope he’d have to fall all the way to mars before he reached the end. He has more rope than he could ever use. At some point the hangman needs to do his job.

If you give someone more than enough rope to hang themselves with, they can hang one end from the ceiling, put the other around their neck and be standing solidly on the floor harm-free.

He’ll just continue to say what he’s always said, that this judge or that attorney or whoever is against him and this, that, and the other is rigged against him. As far as he’s concerned, it’s him vs the world.

Did you hear him the other day when he told people at his rally, “I’m being indicted for you.” Like he’s the second coming of Jesus and he died for his supportters’ sins.

As long as his supporters are on board, he’ll say whatever shit to make him look like the victim. And his supporters will be all for it.

well, that should do it, judge has every signal he's not going to stop, this should put him in jail.

maybe trump wants the fight about jailing him for witness intimidation/"mah freeaaa speekin" rather than the fight over whether or not he intimidated election officials, stole top secret documents, fraudulently diverted campaign funding and fomented a violent civil insurrection

I kinda think he wants to go to jail?? I dont see how that helps him in an election scenario, but maybe its sinking in deeper and deeper for him that he will not get to that point, the feds will have him in jail before 2024. So maybe his play is to get his insane cult so riled over him being in prison up that thousand of them sacrifice their lives in some kind of futile suicide kooaide style ending to all this?
Well, if that wouldn’t be several thousand problems solving themselves…
In U.S. History, men like Trump usually were extreme life-wing types and it didn’t end well for them. I’m shocked so little has happened to him. Everything has been legal and by the book. I’m at the point where I believe that he must be locked up and made an example of or our nation will not survive.

This is the Georgia case, hasn’t gone to a judge yet. Indictment is supposed to happen any time between now and 9/1.

See my “You Are Here” reply under another comment.

“You can’t arrest me for robbing the bank. I hardly know the people who work there.”

For real though, my money is on GA Governor (republican) pardoning him for all these charges, in the name of “unity” or similar bullshit.

The governor of Georgia doesn’t have pardon power. From a recent article in the Journal-Constitution:

Should Trump be convicted of crimes in Fulton, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp would have no authority in granting a pardon. Georgia is one of only six states in which a board, operating independently of the governor, makes the decisions. Here, it’s the secretive State Board of Pardons and Paroles whose five members are appointed by the governor.

Georgia’s current system was created by constitutional amendment in 1943 after former Gov. E.D. Rivers was indicted on corruption charges, including accusations that he sold pardons.

To be considered for a pardon, a person must first complete all prison sentences at least five years before applying, have lived a “law-abiding life” in the intervening years, have no pending charges against them and have paid all their fines in full.

How long you think it will take GA republicans to throw away the state constitution?

If republicans cared even a bit about constitution, we wouldn’t have DJT as a front runner of their party in 2023.

and have paid all their fines in full.

Oh thank God, we’re safe

Georgia passed a law allowing them to remove DAs instead. :(

theguardian.com/…/georgia-brian-kemp-bill-remove-…

Georgia governor signs bill that allows removal of district attorneys

Law that is seen as thinly veiled power grab sets up commission with power to investigate complaints against DAs

The Guardian

Governor of Georgia doesn’t actually have that power. Pardons in Georgia are managed by a panel, and any applicant for a pardon has to have actually completed all required sentences and be free of criminal behavior for five years.

Source: pap.georgia.gov/…/pardons-faqs

In other words, if Trump is found guilty in Georgia, there is no way to wiggle out of it.

Pardons FAQs

State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Georgia law doesn’t allow for pardons by the Governor.

The Judge should lock him up for witness tampering.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 In cases of a threat of physical force intended to witness tamper, the maximum punishment is 20 years in federal prison. Intimidation, threats, or corrupt persuasion also subjects the defendant to a maximum punishment of 20 years imprisonment.

This is a state-level case, so it would be Georgia's criminal code that would apply, not Federal
2020 Georgia Code :: Title 16 - Crimes and Offenses :: Chapter 10 - Offenses Against Public Administration :: Article 5 - Offenses Related to Judicial and Other Proceedings :: § 16-10-93. Influencing Witnesses

Justia Free Databases of US Laws, Codes & Statutes

Justia Law
U.S. Code takes precedence over State Codes. So the State and Federal government can charge him.
serious question, is it possible the judge is literally scared for their life if they do this? the first judge that actually stands up and applies the actual law will be praised by people globally, but become a target for millions of MAGA idiots overnight
Is this the part where we point out (again) that anyone else would be waiting for all this to play out from a jail cell, or at least house arrest, by this point?
I’m not sure which I find more irritating. Witness tampering or media orgs calling Twitter “X.”
It should only ever be referred to as "X, formerly known as Twitter". Much like Prince changing his name, this is a bad move for branding, though I suppose Prince didn't give a fuck about that!
I prefer "Twitter, which Elon Musk refers to as X"
"Twitter, which Elon Musk rebranded as X with an estimated cost of $20 billion"