'Suits' Was Streamed For 3 Billion Minutes on Netflix and the Writers Were Collectively Paid $3,000

The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

https://nofilmschool.com/suits-residuals

'Suits' Was Streamed For 3 Billion Minutes on Netflix and the Writers Were Collectively Paid $3,000

The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

No Film School

Warning: unpopular opinion here.

From the article:

That means that despite the show being a resurgent hit, there were no big secondary payouts.

So, I am an engineer/scientist. Products that I have developed/contributed to development are used by billions of people. Most likely you, the reader of this comment are using it right now, because some of the products I worked on are telecom products, that are widely used to transfer information.

The amount of secondary payouts I receive is EXACTLY ZERO.

My honest question is, why those writers should be any different? They should be paid when they make their products, according to the contract they signed. But why many think they entitled to something more?

And no, I do not think that argument "but it is difficult work, it is not constant" works here. There are lots of difficult, non-constant, seasonal, whatever jobs there that pay even less.

Crab in a bucket mentality.

“I don’t receive residuals, so why should these writers? The executives are entitled to all the profit.”

If all us engineers got paid every time our code was used, the Internet as it exists would be absurdly expensive. Really, it couldn’t exist. Thank god engineers don’t have the same “I need to be paid every time something I created is used by anybody” mentality. You’re building on the work of millions of people before you, you owe it to others to contribute (and make a living in the process).

Of course, the industries are different in important ways. But you should be able to explain the differences, not just wave them away with “ur just jelly lol”

IMHO, copyright and IP law is ridiculously protective. People should get a few years to benefit from their creations, then they should be public domain. This lifetime-plus-70-years bullshit is stupid. Companies are exploiting those stupid laws to milk us on every platform for decades with each media artifact, and artists and writers just want to get a cut of the action. IMHO, it’s the wrong fight, and I can’t really support them in it: “give writers a share of the rent you milk from us” is not a cause I wanna get behind.

But the sales and marketing morons deserve to be paid for everything, of course!

No, they shouldn’t be profiting from rent on IP any more than anybody else does. The government should make some major changes to intellectual property law to stop that.

Anyway…do sales & marketing people get paid an unreasonable amount? Are they rolling in cash while writers suffer? Seems to me that most the marketing people I’ve met in my life were just getting along like everybody else. They don’t seem like the right people to be angry at.

You worked in a shitty industry, I’m in the valley and the marketing guys make top bank, I was a Sr principal at one of the biggies and they blow me out of the water.

Sales is often on a different level, commission is incredible.

Where do you think the money is going?

I was reading a book on this recently and it had a good reason for why some departments get all the money and some don’t. Imagine you have a market that is saturated with products. In that case, sales is what brings in the most money, so they have the most power and get paid accordingly. Now imagine a post-war booming economy where every car made gets sold. Sales and engineering performance are not that important, but financial departments grew immensely, because the competition was on optimizing, cost-cutting and consolidation. Last example: new industry, still figuring out the best methods, products and killer apps: engineering has the most power. Given the economy we’re in right now, where money is tight, new products outside the AI hype/boom are going to be companies fighting to sell you their product, so marketing is winning right now, but it may change.

Easier answer: social skills + their whole job is ass-kissing, they get very good at it.

Imagine how good engineers could be if they didn’t have to waste all their time doing actual work.

Yes, that same book also talked about how success and pay is only 5% performance and the rest is self promotion and sucking up…that helps put a lot of life in perspective

The estimated total pay for a Marketing Executive at Walt Disney Company is $106,208 per year.

glassdoor.com/…/Walt-Disney-Company-Marketing-Exe…

The estimated total pay for a Writer at Walt Disney Company is $69,619 per year. This number represents the median, which is the midpoint of the ranges

glassdoor.com/…/Walt-Disney-Company-Writer-Salari…

Disney pays higher than average. Writers can get paid a hell of a lot less. And it’s often only a part-time job that lasts only a few weeks or months a year.

So yeah, I’d say the marketing executives get paid an unreasonable amount compared to the writers who actually make a huge contribution to creating the product.