Wrote about the ~current state~ of social media, and why Mastodon, while far from perfect, is pretty much the only decent app left standing at this point

https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-08-07/column-its-the-end-of-social-media-as-we-know-it-we-should-feel-fine

Column: A few sick days made it clear — Twitter is dying, and so is social media as we know it

Social media is dying after the implosion of Twitter. Threads, Bluesky and Mastodon are trying to replace X but are coming up short. Maybe that's OK.

Los Angeles Times
@brianmerchant everyone is blaming musk for destroying Twitter, whereas I congratulate him for proving that social networks are expensive to operate and make almost no money

@scottburton @brianmerchant I am not sure if that’s entirely true. Social networks create an awful lot of money for so called „influencers“.

The top 4 accounts on only fans create around $40 - $50 million dollars in subscription fees per month.

The top 10 earners get $1 - $2 million dollars per post on instagram.

If a tiny percentage of those revenues is not enough to finance your social network, maybe you’re doing something wrong.

What am I missing?

@tomgrau @brianmerchant you’re missing the fact the network’s revenue and an influencer’s revenue are totally independent and unrelated. And probably a few other things too?

@scottburton @brianmerchant If you are referring to the fact that influencer revenue is not funneled through social networks, than you are of course right, but I didn’t forget that.

But saying those things are „totally independent“ is simply not entirely true.

Influencer revenue is 99% dependent on followers and interaction on social media. Hence, a tier model like: „1000 followers are free, above that, you have to pay“ wouldn’t be impossible.

@scottburton @brianmerchant I never understood why social networks are spending billions of dollars to create „tools“ for incluncers to make millions and give them away for free 🤷‍♀️