sjvnThis is true.
bmaxv@sjvn running the same code again without changing it is actually very important to make sure it's reproducible. Just because that's the case most of the time, doesn't mean it's not effective at doing showing that.
Otherwise I agree.
ator robot@bmaxv @sjvn I'm terrified of doing that before I've got an idea of what's happening, because I've had too mny bad run-ins where a problem occurs very rarely and I don't know when I will get the chance to investigate it again. It is for this reason I tend to add logging in anticipation, instead of AFTER something goes wrong.