On the one hand, I think that’s great. We need more nuclear power to mitigate the climate disaster.

On the other hand, I don’t trust anything Bill Gates does after he totally fucked up the U.S. education system.

We don’t need more nuclear power to mitigate the climate disaster we need to stop endless consumerism and strip of power these who got us here.

Would you prefer using coal instead? If we are going to transition away from fossil fuels, nuclear will have to be a part of our new generation system.

I would prefer using renewable sources and cutting off the useless shit like private jets

The world would be a bit better if everyone flew coach or stayed home, but it would be a lot better if the developing world had access to lighting, air conditioning, washing machines, and transportation without a corresponding increase in carbon emissions.

Renewables (with storage and long-distance transmission) are part of the solution, but we need to invest in all viable forms of carbon-free energy like there’s no tomorrow, because if we don’t, then for a lot of people there won’t be.

The world can’t be better if the plan is to make things worst (planned obsolescence). Feeding these who got us there is not a solution to the problem

I definitely agree with you on how planned obsolescence and consumerism is a huge issue. But we still need energy from something and this sounds like a great start.

I’m all about the three R’s. Especially prioritizing the order they are in.

REDUCE and REUSE first, recycle only if needed.