Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors

https://lemmy.world/post/2861143

Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors - Lemmy.world

Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors::A Bill Gates-backed clean energy player is hoping to build dozens of nuclear reactors in the UK and will compete with global rivals.

On the one hand, I think that’s great. We need more nuclear power to mitigate the climate disaster.

On the other hand, I don’t trust anything Bill Gates does after he totally fucked up the U.S. education system.

So travelling wave is out and SMRs are in? Right. What both have in common is that they’re just pipe dreams. Nuclear power never was and never will be economically viable. If we could all just accept that we could get on with real solutions.

The energy density of nuclear fuels is unparalleled.

Modern reactor designs are extremely safe and stable, the only downside is the cost.

The cost is so high because they are basically boutique projects. Having a standardized design with mass produced components would go a long way to making nuclear reactors more affordable.

We’ve had 70 years to figure out how to produce cost-competitive nuclear energy. It’s time to move on.
And electric cars have had over 100 years, so should we have given up on them? Your argument is flawed.
Not at all. We’ve seen massive advancements with EVs, 300+ miles ranges for under $40k are common now. Has nuclear both gotten more capable and cheaper during its lifetime? The answer is a resounding no.

The technology of modern reactors ,like the one in the article, is a greater advancement from early reactors that the 1900th century electric car to a modern one.

The materials, manufacturing techniques, fuels, controls, and components are only achievable due to modern advancements.

The latest reactors will be cheaper, more efficient, and safer. They are a necessary stopgap to overcome the transient nature of renewable energy in the UK and an important piece in ensuring energy availability and detachment from from fossil fuels.

All of those EV advancements were only in the passed 20 years.

The first electric vehicle was made well over 100 years ago. Until very recently they were considered wildly expensive and impractical.

You consider nuclear to me unnecessary and impractical because we’ve had the tech for 75 years and it’s still expensive. Yet nuclear tech is younger than EVs, and you discredit advancements because… reasons.

Your stance confuses me.

Why is it confusing? One is a battery on wheels, the other is controlled nuclear fission, creating steam to drive turbines for electricity generation.

Now I know you’re just trolling.

Have a good night

I’m not trolling, you’re just a little slow is all.
It’s your stance that is confusing. I mean if you didn’t strawman on purpose.