@EposVox
I fail to understand how his personal donation has to do anything with his company.
Do I agree with his views? No.
Does he have a legal right to support a political campaign that aligns with his views? Yes.
Did he do anything illegal in this story? No.
Does the product harm anybody in any way, shape or form for their sexual orientation? I haven't heard of such occurrence.
Again, I do not agree with his views, I do not use the Brave browser, but this point specifically triggers me.
@bitals @EposVox the point is that using Brave contributes to the wealth of the CEO who can then fund more anti-LGBTQ+ shit.
Some people can separate the product from the creator(s), but I for one believe that if I want to make a change, I have to stop supporting projects/companies/whatever that are run by people who's views go against mine and do real damage to the world
@gregandcin
Just came up with an analogy for my point.
https://downfall.page/
This is a new catastrophic Intel CPU vulnerability discovered by a Google engineer, so he works for a company I strongly dislike.
Boycotting the Brave browser that does not require funding the CEO in favor of using another and proprietary Chromium-based browser for me feels like boycotting the Downfall mitigation because I don't like Google. I am mostly hurting myself and the whole internet crowd security.