I’ve spent much of this year examining car bloat, the process through which smaller vehicles are being replaced by increasingly massive SUVs and trucks.

What I’ve learned: Huge cars are terrible for society, often in ways that are hidden.

Some basic facts:
◆ >80% of US car sales are now trucks/SUVs.
◆ Models keep expanding. For example, the F-150 is now ~800 lbs heavier and 7 inches taller than in 1991.
◆ EVs can make the problem worse due to huge batteries.

Continued (THREAD)

#cars #climate

Problem 1️⃣ : Car bloat endangers others on the street

Tall vehicles have bigger blind spots and are more likely to strike a person’s torso or head.

Heavier vehicles exert more force crashing into a person, bicycle, or smaller car. They also have longer braking distances.

Problem 2️⃣ : Car bloat worsens climate change

Heavier cars require more energy to move, which makes them guzzle gas.

When electrified, their huge batteries are so inefficient that the biggest models generate more pollution that some gas-powered sedans.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90854942/the-blatant-greenwashing-of-suvs

Problem 3️⃣ : Car bloat shreds tires

Heavier cars exert more pressure on tires, eroding them faster.

Tire particles are absorbed into water, where they damage ecosystems. They also float through the air, harming human health when ingested.

https://t.co/NN3EguO020

Electric Cars Are Sending Tire Particles Into the Soil, Air, and Water

Electric cars fix one pollution problem—and worsen another.

The Atlantic
@davidzipper so what do we do, David? I mean really all people in the transport planning profession see this, are asking the same questions, but except for some ideas in cities like Paris about more expensive parking, nothing seems to be able to get these car manufacturers to stop bloating.
@Marrekoo @davidzipper taxes per kilogram.

@mr_enzzo @Marrekoo @davidzipper If certain design decisions make a car more dangerous to pedestrians, the vehicle should be illegal no matter how rich you are, unless there really is a pragmatic need for such vehicles. Then you can require special safety features and a special license.

Making it more expensive can't really be the primary or only solution here.

@ids1024 @mr_enzzo @davidzipper right. But somehow, NCAP and other government institutions have concluded that these cars are safe. In other words: what is their agenda on this/ what political decisions are not taken to make these institutions do their job to improve traffic safety?

@mr_enzzo @ids1024 @davidzipper @Marrekoo I’m not as familiar with these risk assessments, but this comment reminded me of environmental health risk assessment issues — that it’s not that the evaluation results are false, it’s that we need to change the metrics for assessing safety.

I’m a driver, and these beasts worry me even in my car — the bumper of these so-called passenger pickups are at the window level of my little Prius c.

@Marrekoo @mr_enzzo @davidzipper My impression is that part of the problem is that they're focused on danger to people in the car and not enough on the danger to pedestrians. But I don't know exactly how they operate; just that this *should* be a much bigger focus.

@ids1024 @Marrekoo @mr_enzzo @davidzipper Agreed

At a minimum, visibility rules would be a sensible safety addition (e.g. "A small child who stands 1m tall must be visible from the driver's seat when standing within 0.5m of the front of the vehicle")

It'd be a nice simple rule, and easy to test and enforce. And the safety reasons for it are self evident.

@ids1024 @Marrekoo @mr_enzzo @davidzipper afaik these trucks-marketed-for-people get treated differently legally in the us and have lower security/efficiency/cleanlyness standards.
@Marrekoo @ids1024 @mr_enzzo @davidzipper one problem is the ideology that car crashes should be treated as natural desasters one can't do anything about it. Each (fatal) car crash should lead to an inquiry into how it came to happen and result an an action plan on how to avoid it to happen again, like it's common in many industries.