The difference between a con and a cult is that when you debunk a con, the victims get mad at the con artist, but when you debunk a cult, the victims get mad at *you.*

MAGAts look like suckers, but they're in deeper than that. They're cult members. Their very identities require T---p be perfect, so they fully and eagerly inhabit a fantasy world.

We need to get better as a culture at cult-proofing students and cult deprogramming adults.

@airbagmoments We might have to expand our definition of what constitutes a "cult".
@airbagmoments Agree. We're going to have to expand our definition of what constitutes a "cult".
@Alan I know of at least one leading cult expert who has no problem calling it a cult. He even wrote a book about it. https://www.amazon.com/Cult-Trump-Leading-Explains-President/dp/1982127333
@airbagmoments I wasn't disagreeing at all. I was suggesting that the people who cultified around Trump had already cultified - around their religion.

@Alan Ahh. Yes.

Cult: a small, unpopular religion.
Religion: a large, popular cult.

We also need a new definition of "delusion" and "psychosis."

@airbagmoments The problem is, as with many conservative politicians, he offers easy answers to the increasing complexity of life. Cult-proofing people would require that they be willing to accept that modern life is complex and doesn't lend itself to simple answers. I don't know how you make people comfortable with that.
@ianhecht It's definitely paddling upstream. It's why Gore's climate chaos film was brilliantly entitled An Inconvenient Truth. But people mostly aren't naturally inclined to learn math, either.
@airbagmoments this also shows that very often crypto con victims are actually members of a cryptocurrency cult
@airbagmoments victims of con artists often get mad at debunkers, too. Rather than face the shame of admitting they fell for a con, they'll often go right on falling for it right up until the moment when they're out of money and the con artist disappears.