Why is lemmy.world defederating from hexbear.net?

https://lemmy.world/post/2475933

Why is lemmy.world defederating from hexbear.net? - Lemmy.world

What is lemmy.world doing defederating before hexbear even federates? lemmy.world/instances [https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0a9a04ae-5cb8-4809-b4bf-b0ea22219f3a.png] https://lemmy.world/post/747912?scrollToComments=true [https://lemmy.world/post/747912?scrollToComments=true] This is what it took to defederate from exploding-heads after being federated with them since the start of lemmy.world What evidence do you have of hexbear breaking the lemmy or citizen code of conduct? Has the criteria for defederation changed?

Ah… it’s so deliciously cynically amusing to watch tankies whine about being subject to someone else’s authority.
Here come the “tankies bad” whiners, right on cue.
Tankies are bad though
“Tankie” is a meaningless term libs use to dismiss anyone to the left of them. It’s as empty as boomers calling everything to the left of Reagan “communist.”
Would you prefer Authoritarian Left instead? Because authoritarian is authoritarian is authoritarian. Left or right fuck off with your supreme leader bullshit.
Weird how I’ve been in so-called “tankie” spaces for years and I never hear praise for authoritarian leaders. It’s almost as if all these “tankies bad” whiners are just liberals who don’t actually know jack shit about communism and are literally indistinguishable from the “woke bad” nonsense I hear from reactionaries.

I never said anything about you praising authoritarian leaders, that’s the picture you’re painting in your head. Whether or not you’re praising them, I think ‘supreme leader’ encompasses the definition:

“leaders behavior that asserts absolute authority and control over subordinates and [that] demands unquestionable obedience from subordinates.”

Unquestionable obedience. Like a master and a slave. Like a dog.

‘Tankie’ is often associated with Marxist-Leninists.

Taken from the ‘communism’ wiki page,

Communists often seek a voluntary state of self-governance but disagree on the means to this end. This reflects a distinction between a more libertarian approach of communization, revolutionary spontaneity, and workers’ self-management, and a more authoritarian vanguardist or communist party-driven approach through the development of a socialist state followed by the withering away of the state.

Would you look at that. Authoritarian approach. The root of disagreement among communist.

Wow a completely misinterpreted wikipedia quote, you sure showed me.

I never said anything about you praising authoritarian leaders, that’s the picture you’re painting in your head.

You started going on about “supreme leaders” out of nowhere, how exactly was I supposed to interpret that?

Either way I think it’s funny that the other user who replied to you gave a much more detailed and educated answer than I did yet you chose to ignore them and reply to me instead. It’s almost as if you don’t actually to want to have a conversation and learn things, you’re just here to troll.