nature_man
RoundcatHere's the difference though. Tea leaves will actually drive the ants way.
Bappitycan confirm, queen is dead but I still say god save the queen out of habit
diprount_tomatoWhen your king is that old, it’s wise to not get used to “god save the king”
I give him a couple years tops
It’s not that I wish him to be dead, but he has been waiting for the crown for too long to actually enjoy a reign
I want the dictator dead.
Then fuck off, ignorant
One man shouldn’t rule a country because of who his mum was. Democracy is good.
AnUnusualRelicHe doesn’t really rule anything except the front page of tabloids every now and then.
So what’s with this hundred million pound ceremony to crown him king? There are thousands of better uses for that money.
Well, it seems you forget that the royal house gives all their estate earnings in exchange of a fixed salary
In order to have earnings, you have to earn something. They have stealings.
They have their property and produce in them. That’s not stealing and I think it’s impossible to argue with a thickhead like you
Democracy isn’t incompatible with a monarchy you fucking donkey
Democracy is very incompatible with dictatorship
As I see, it’s impossible to argue with idiots
This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥But the next monarch is King too.
Sounds like Death needs to aim for a double kill. Been too long since Britain had a child monarch.
Everyone makes fun of the British museum, but am*ricans stole too, even entire fucking buildings
Wait, really? Can you tell me more? I don’t know what to google.
BlackmistStole their entire country from the natives for a start.
That was kinda the British too… But there was plenty of bad colonial attitude to go around.
Dog, they were sent by the British to do explicitly that. You don’t get to feign innocence.
gmtomNot really true. The early British colonies had a lot of peaceful trade and alliances with native tribes until the first Indian war. And even after the first Indian war, the British did nothing that could be considered even remotely close to the genocide of the Americans westward expansion.
“…The British did nothing that could be considered even remotely close to the genocide…”
Except for the Boer concentration camps, the Irish famine, the Bengal famine, the partition of India…
i meant in north America before the revolution, but thats my bad for not being specfic.
samus12345And the first (colonial) Americans were originally British.
Beans and toast? 🤨
Exactly, what kind of blasphemy is this? It’s beams on toast.
Beams, Jesus? Your day job is showing…
Didn’t you read the Bible you jerk? It says Thou shan’t correcth thy son of God on thy interneths.
Jesus, Jesus. Aren’t you supposed to be turning the other cheek or something?
“All ants are British 'cuz they colonize” -Dan Cummins
I was amazed just how true this was. There was a collosal head and arm of an Egyptian statue
I was amazed just how true this is. There was a collosal head and arm of an Egyptian statue in the British museum, and a plaque saying the rest of the statue (body and legs) were still where they found it. Presumably because they were to heavy to take back.
Poplar?Nah it was away from their colonies, thats how money gets made.
According to this, British people are ants as I am pretty sure that ants would enjoy the sweet beans on toast.
SneezycatYeah British people are just a subset of weak ants, clearly.
Although they’d probably prefer the sickly sugar water that Heinz come in, rather than the far superior Branston beans.
This requires some experimentation.
To the lab!
It’s really not on at all that some countries still have their own cultural icons. They all need to be in the British museum where they can be conveniently appreciated.
Lifted_loweredWe need to do one for the continent where it’s like France/Belgium/Netherlands Venn diagram with the neighbor’s dog that they swear isn’t racist but only barks at black people.