The consent has to be: „I’ll listen to you and take you seriously - as long as you’re not a fucking Nazi.“
@weltraumpirat
I totally agree with the monopoly of the state and you elaborated on the very problem with Stauffenberg.
But to me it always felt strange, that facism first has to "prove" itself by reprisals, deportations, murder and war before someone stepping up is considered a hero.
@spfeiffer
@oli @weltraumpirat @spfeiffer
As a lesser informed person (btw thank you for the disrespect) I just searched the internet for Elser.
Elser's attack was in 1939 and Stauffenberg's was in 1944, thus after 1933 and you claim it to be "violence in a democracy" long after Hitler took over .
Imho an informed person would take that into account, and would not take uprise in a dictatorship as argument for violence in a democracy.
But I'm just uninformed, so what do I know.
@OGjester Not helpful. Too many wars have been led under the pretense of „defending against fascists“, most recently Putin‘s invasion in Ukraine. That’s a slippery slope.
As a last resort, there may be no other way. Right now, let’s just take a firm stand and property exclude them, rather than catering the media agenda to them every day.