@rahmstorf

As the X-Twitter-protokoll is closed now, i would like to read it also here?

@rahmstorf thank you. Great work, as always! 🙏

Small remark: same here, sometimes. We're reluctant to post links to  on Mastodon, but sometimes it's ok or — like in your case — absolutely justified.

@rahmstorf as an unlogged user (i deleted my account) i could only see the first tweet.
But threadreader knows about it so here it goes https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1684903347118051328.html

edit: sadly it seems to be missing attached pictures, so need to click on individual links to see them on twitter, but better than nothing :/

edit: actually better on nitter https://nitter.nl/rahmstorf/status/1684903347118051328

@rahmstorf
Reading threads without being logged on no longer works. But you can share via ThreadReader, which makes them more readable anyway.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1684903347118051328

@rahmstorf In „nature climate change“ vom Jänner 2023 gab es eine Grafik, die darstellt, dass das Risiko eines Kollapses des #AMOC pro Grad Temperaturerhöhung um etwa 10% zunimmt. Das ist das Tausendfache von dem, was die Gesellschaft allgemein als (rechtlich) zulässiges Risiko einer Technologie akzeptiert.

Eine halbwegs stichfeste Beweisführung zu den Risiken fossiler Technologie im Hinblick auf einen Kollaps könnte deren Einsatz juristisch beenden.

Ist das machbar?