@neil @waltertross

My big problem is that so much modern documentation is html and when I'm developing under battery power, Firefox is usually my biggest drain.

But I should take another shot at links. Back when both were still relevant, lynx was the one I got used to.

@suetanvil @neil @waltertross Firefox really isn’t anything like as slick or optimised as it could (should?) be. I’ve said before that Mozilla are too often too complacent about it. Being “not Chrome” just isn’t good enough to be a viable replacement for the average user :-(
@wiredfire @neil @suetanvil Is there an example website where Firefox is not a "viable replacement" for Chrome? (I don't know one, but this is a serious question)