Please rename this community or change the subject

https://feddit.de/post/1865106

Please rename this community or change the subject - Feddit

This is another example of US centrism. This is [email protected]. From the name there is no indication that this wouldn’t be about world politics. Please rename the community or change the subject to world politics and create a community like [email protected].

According to lemmy.fediverse.observer/list, lemmy.world isn’t even hosted in the US, but instead in Africa.
Fediverse Observer checks all sites in the fediverse and gives you an easy way to find a home from a map or list or automatically.

Lemmy Sites Status. Find a Lemmy server to sign up for, find one close to you!

Interesting, I wonder what the rationale is behind that?
Why it’s hosted in Africa? First, it’s just the data reported on fediverse.observer. I am not totally sure it’s correct. But if it is, it’s probably to avoid regulation/legal issues.
The creator is a Netherlender.
I agree but looking at the community's avatar I think it is a lost cause.
But it’s not in the url and it’s not in the name.

Again, I agree but the mention of reddit tells me they are just trying to recreate r/politics in the fediverse.

The saddest thing I see here is people creating clones of subs, making themselves the mod and the subs lie empty as they don't want to actually created content just be a mod. They are not creating a community, they are just name squatting.

I doubt it'd even due to cloning. It's just due to how Americans refer to politics. America is much more insulted from world events, so world politics is less talked about except in how it affects America. News stations, media, television, academia, everything, generally refers to it as "politics".

Ultimately, that being said, this is a terrible precedent to overthrow a community that has broken no rules. It's mob mentality and censorship. It is in violation of the fediverse principles. I even agree the naming convention would be better, but I don't think it should happen unless the admins make a rule.

Ultimately, that being said, this is a terrible precedent to overthrow a community that has broken no rules.

What?

I don't see any pitchforks being waved in the thread.

Can you point to a comment that even vaguely suggests what you claim?

It's mob mentality and censorship.

What?

Asking (politely) a sub name to reflect its content is mob mentality and censorship.?

This is not the first post on the topic.
Then post comments in threads where they are relevant as that will avoid this sort of confusion.
What? Are you having a stroke? What is this responding to? How is this a logical response?
And how is it logical to go straight to the mods instead of both asking the mods and seeing how the users in the community feel about it?

What are you talking about? No one is saying “Delete this channel”, but rather “Either change the name of the channel to USpolitics or remove the rule that forbids discussing non-US politics in the ‘politics’ channel”.

If you think that asking for the bare minimum fairness that the name “politics” shouldn’t be a default of the US, your problem isn’t that your country isn’t being treated unfairly, but rather that you want your country to be treated with privilege.

You can't rename a community as far as I'm aware.

So you are asking that.

You're asking them to either create a new community from scratch or... change the meaning of the community to something they don't want to do (otherwise that's what they would have done).

Fairness? Are we four years old? They followed the rules. That's fair. They got it first. Create a community on another server. It's the damn fediverse. That's the entire point. Lemmy.world isn't literally the world. Stop promoting centralization with this crap.

I hate to blow your mind at this hour of the day, but every country refers to their own politics as just "politics".

I mean, if you're on that wavelength you're gonna freak out when you hear what Italians call Italian food.

I think you're missing the point. Try harder. And use context. Just think about what this whole post is about.
Did you mean to say insulated?
Petition the admins to create community rules. Otherwise I see no issue. I don't follow it, but I also don't think you can steam roll a community that hasn't broken any rules simply because of your feelings.

Who’s talking about steamrolling? Is asking steamrolling now?

All I did was literally what you say. I petition the mods to please do the change, and a lot of people followed.

Of the ~10k subscribed people, ~2% upvoted this post in the last two hours while ~0.3% downvoted. That’s some significant numbers. Let’s see how it goes over the next day or so.

But none of that is steamrolling. As if anyone of the users here had the power to actually change something…

Considering people have been posting about this issue for much longer than a few days, I'm guessing nothing will happen. You aren't the first to complain. That's why I'm salty about it. It's pointless and annoying. Maybe something will happen simple because people won't shut up about it. People complain more here than they do on reddit about this stuff, at least relative to other content. Something so insignificant as the name of a community on one single server. I really don't want to start having to get community names approved by admins or something. I don't know how else you'd expect to tackle this problem.

As far as I know, there's no way to migrate a community. You're asking them to shutdown and start a new one.

All because they got a community name that you think should belong to some other group.

As an American that came from Reddit I completely agree. I never went to r/politics on Reddit for the same reason. Sixteen posts about some stupid shit Trump did or bullshit about Hunter Biden that I could not give two shits about. “Hunter Biden has porn! How scandalous!” While there is literally fucking riots and wars going on around the world because of political issues.

I see US politics as the biggest reality show ever produced. Nothing is about governing just shitting on the people from the other side.

All articles and discussion are about what the other side is doing wrong (hint: everything).

Kayfabe.
Thanks for the new word. Interesting etymology.

Exactly what I thought.

Thats is politics on the same level as me calling you a stupid poopface. Political in a sense that everything is political but nothing more.

I agree. The name is really US-centrist. Not giving good vibes.

Bitch, other countries use english too. No country should have dibs on general words to represent something that conserns, in this case, only one country.

I have noticed the same thing about US government websites end in .gov I think no government should have that privledge. Other governments use english too. Could US officials take their head out of their asses and use an ending like .usgov

Or .gov.us, like every other country uses their tld, like .gov.uk. Only the US is conceited enough to not use their own tld.
It looks like you do get first dibs on shizzle you invent. The UK is the only country that does not put the name of the country on their postage stamps, because when they started using them there was no other issuer.
Well Americans did develop most of the advances and the first internet is from DARPA. Would seem to make sense that they took the .gov TLD. Can you really be upset about that?
It is doubtful that any meaningful research can be attested to a single country since globalisation. Every technological marvel you see is the result of international research collaborations from dozens of universities, institutes and corporations around the world. It’s very egocentric to assume that the U.S. is the only or the dominant motor of innovation.
I don’t disagree with you, but it doesn’t negate that the first “Internet” was a US military project which was then taken over by predominately US universities and they created the TLD in 1985 before another country did.

IRC there's a museum in Paris which proudly shows all the inventions made by the French. It's worth a visit, simply because you'll likely have been taught plenty of them were American inventions. If you're a Brit, you'll have been taught many of those same inventions were British.

Jingoism and claiming inventions go hand in hand.

So if you visit a French museum and exhibit on the internet, they'd likey focus on Rémi Després, who was cited by Kahn and Cerf in their paper which IRC proposed the concept of TCP/IP. If you visit a British museum, they'll spend more time discussing Tim Berners-Lee and the world wide web. A Russian museum might mention Sary Shagan, who helped develop computer networks in the 1950s or they might mention OGAS a 1960s plan for a nationwide computer network.

It's the same for things like radio, the telephone, mobile telephones or television. Depending on who you ask, the country that invented it changes.

The reality is often more nuanced and complicated.

Great work on following up with examples, very informative.
But wait what’s going to happen to [email protected] then?
anime_titties - Lemmy.world

A place to discuss world news and geopolitics. You can join our discord at https://discord.gg/DtnRnkE [https://discord.gg/DtnRnkE] Rules: Rule 1: Follow general etiquette and common sense Applies to posts and comments Rule 2: Posting Guidelines Applies to posts 2.1 - Types of submissions 2.1.1 Submissions must be links to news articles. 2.1.2 The source must either be the original website or an archive of the original. 2.1.3 Submissions may not be older than 14 days. 2.1.4 The submission’s title may not be editorialised (express opinions rather than just report the news). If the country/countries involved is not apparent, put their names in the title in brackets 2.2 - Submissions must pertain to politics or major events 2.2.1 Interactions, relations, and developments between: A. Governments: Nation-states, top-level subdivisions, or autonomous regions B. Major non-state actors: Large multi-national corporations, trans-national unions/institutions, regional warlords, terrorist organisations, major independence movements, or international criminal organisations 2.2.2 Significant internal political developments with direct consequences to their region or the wider world. 2.2.3 Major aspects of the climate, environment and health. 2.2.4 Major disasters, both natural and man-made, affecting large groups of people or wide areas. 2.3 - US/China/India content restriction 2.3.1 The number of paragraphs with more than a passing reference to the USA, China or India in any capacity should not exceed more than 50% of the article. Includes special administrative regions such as Hong Kong, Guam, Macau and Puerto Rico. 2.3.2 Major non-state actors (as described in 2.2.1-B) are exempt from the 50% rule 2.3.3 If it is unclear due to large or inconsistently sized paragraphs, then the same criteria should be applied to the number of sentences instead. 2.4 - Content quality 2.4.1 Submissions must be of good quality. As such, the following content is strictly prohibited: Advertisements Conspiracy theories Personal blog posts Satire Debunked/fabricated content 2.4.2 The quality of content will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and is at the discretion of the moderators. 2.5 - Non-English articles 2.5.1 Non-english articles may be posted, but only if accompanied by a comment containing the article’s English translation. 2.5.2 Translation must be conducted by using either DeepL or Google Translate. 2.5.3 Do not use your own translation unless it is being used to rectify errors in the software’s translation. 2.5.4 Localisation corrections (such as figure of speech) should be provided in square brackets beside the original. Rule 3: Spamming and agendaposting Applies to posts and comments 3.1 - Spamming 3.1.1 A user may only submit 5 posts per 24 hours. Any submissions that exceed this 5-post limit will automatically be removed. 3.1.2 A user can only post if the account has at least 200 comment karma. 3.1.3 Users may not engage in disruptive behaviour or no-value added spamming, including brigading. 3.2 - Agendaposting 3.2.1 Agendaposting is the process of only, or mostly submitting posts that conform to a certain agenda or political stance. This is strictly prohibited. 3.2.2 If more than 67% of recent posts are considered to be exclusively pushing the same agenda, then action will be taken. 3.2.3 Users are prohibited from accusing other users of agendaposting in the comments. Complaints on particular suspected agendaposters are only allowed via the report system, or via modmailing with substantial evidence to demonstrate a said user is an agendaposter. 3.2.4 Agendaposting is reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators. Rule 4: Keep it civil Applies to comments 4.1 To encourage healthy debates, the following behaviours are prohibited: Personal attacks Name-calling Harassment of any kind Discrimination, including: Age, disability, ethnicity, gender, origin, religion, or sexual orientation 4.2 Attacks will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators. 4.3 Retaliation in the same manner is also forbidden - perpetrators should instead be reported. 4.4 Whataboutism and similar off-topic deviation is prohibited in top-level comments and replies, and as primary focus of a comment, in order to keep discussions on topic with respect to the contents of the post. Whataboutism will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators. 4.5 Linking to Comments and Posts unrelated to the current topic and to users not involved in the current conversation (excluding mods or exceptionally informative comments shared in good faith) is not allowed. Any unrelated link will be removed and any user suspected of sharing links in attempt to harass or encourage harassment will be permanently banned from participation.

Only good things. It’s name will represent what’s posted - quality content

Hopefully it will die and something like /geopolitics will take over.

I call it RCS (reddit clone syndrome).

Rather than let this place grow organically and have its own traditions and in jokes a group of people seem determined to make a clone of the place they recently left.

The name swapping was funny, but it was never practical. Many people who should find it or want to find it ended up didn't. Not only is there a name barrier, there's also a barrier to them just clicking away or not engaging. World politics should be the more visible one compared to US politics anyway. Many people, especially Americans, would benefit from learning what politics is like in other parts of the world.
Oh dang I forgot about that sub!
Yes finally good thread. Please don’t just copy and paste reddit communities like this. This is an international community, so if you want to discuss US politics, name it like this at least. We don’t need to copy the dumb stuff from reddit.
What if… There happens an uprising and people just start using this community for wold politics? Would be cool first lemmy sub drama
Totally agree. Either change it to something like [email protected] or change the focus to world politics. There is so much more stuff going on around the globe politically, having everything ‘default’ to the US is such a myopic point of view.

Petition the admins to create rules and apply them retroactively. Otherwise any other attempt to force your will is in violation of the fediverse. The community did not break any rules and sometimes shit sucks. Feelings don't get you what you want. I agree the naming convention would be better. But it's still entirely arbitrary. Shouldn't a community just called "politics" discuss political science and the concept of politics? It didn't say "worldpolitics" either. If someone created a "baseball" community and dedicated it to US baseball, I'd agree the name isn't the best, but there are no names. Lemmy.world said it's open to anyone. It never said it's communities needed to follow any arbitrary naming conventions.

You're right. It would be better. But a lot of things would be better in the world. Create a world politics community elsewhere. Everyone complaining about one single instance are not understanding the fediverse to begin with.

All political discussions should be welcome here. Just don’t complain when 75% of the posts still revolve around the US simply out of the sheer size of the country.

This is the sanest take.

People get mad about the amount of US news, but forget the US is essentially 52 (or more if we broke up by sheer size, or by populations or cultures) countries.

And the rest of the 194 nations of the world? The US is not the biggest nation in the world, and definitely not the only one.
if we're talking politics in English, it's arguably the largest, though that depends on how exactly you weigh 2nd language speakers in India
I don't think it makes that much sense, however you slice it, tbh, see my sibling comment.
It's against this community's rules to discuss non US politics.
Yeah. This whole post is technically discussing about that rule.
Sorry, I was trying to reply to the person above you who was saying to just post other stuff is the sanest take.

That doesn't really hold. To pick just two examples: Europe is 50-ish states (ca. 750 million people), the Indian subcontinent is almost 2b people.

Internet used to be US-centric, and English is still its lingua franca, but saying that 3/4 of the content here is US-related because of the sheer size of the country doesn't make that much sense.

The US is the 3rd most populated country in the world and we all speak English. It is also the richest country in the world, by a long shot, which means more Americans are likely to have access to the internet. It is comically ignorant to think that the vast majority of stuff posted wouldn’t revolve around the US. Demographics for Reddit are far easier to find but I would claim traffic here would be similar. So on Reddit roughly 50% of traffic came from the US which was nearly 7X higher than the 2nd highest country (UK). We don’t need rules here which keep other politics out, but US politics will absolutely dominate discussion.

It is also the richest country in the world, by a long shot

You’re more like 7ths, but ok.

Total wealth is a pretty useless indicator. Now make it per capita or use the more common GDP messure, and it looks something like that:

wisevoter.com/…/richest-countries-in-the-world/

Richest Countries in the World 2023 - Wisevoter

When it comes to measuring a country’s wealth, the most common metric used is Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The GDP measures the total value of goods and services produced within a country’s borders over a certain period, usually a year. Because the GDP is influenced by the population, the GDP per capita is a better […]

Wisevoter
  • 34% of the world's entire population lives in India or China. India is also the world's largest democracy. US is tiny by comparison.

  • this sub's rules explicitly state all contributions have to be about US politics specifically.

What does the first point have to do with anything? China is (or at least was as of a few months ago) the most populated country in the world… do you see many Chinese language posts on this site? Yeah, me neither. And that’s because Lemmy, just like Reddit, is a predominantly English language site.

India is far more populous than the US but they have a poverty rate over 80%. I don’t think people in poverty are wasting their time roaming the internet on their expensive smartphones. That’s a luxury afforded to far more people in Western countries and no other Western country is even remotely as large as the US that also speaks English.

You’re the one who started taking about the “sheer size of the country” when truth is the USA just punches above its weight, that’s all.

what does the first point have to do with anything?

I'm addressing your claim that US-centric bias on an international site is due to "simply out of the sheer size of the country"

That's obviously not the reason. Here, you actually seem to be agreeing with me.