@AT1ST
Democratic isn't about voting only.
It is about upward control and political equality.
In situations where following stated preferences leads to worse results then revealed preferences insisting on stated preferences is ... like insisting on a winner takes all rule.
@freemin7 In the sense of double blind testing a lot of the time - neither side really knows at serving time who gets A or who gets B.
And the way A/B testing determines the results is more opaque than normal democratic means.
@AT1ST
A/B testing *is not* science. A/B testing is engineering.
Not research but search and optimization.
A/B testing is less opaque than the US voting system in terms of upward control. If you mean "less opaque" as in worse audibility this is a consequence of the employment of the method under capitalism not the method itself.
@AT1ST
A/B testing is not science because it doesn't form a model.
Experiments in A/B are not run based on a hypothesis constrained by past experiments which are invalidated or not based on an observation.
A/B tests give an ordering between alternatives on some metrics. A/B testing will never tell you that the dice are intransitive. Sciene will.
@wolf480pl
You vastly overestimate how much peoples "conscious decisions" are actually not just impulses, instincts integrated over time shaped by contact with other humans in their environment.
Voting is not free and a vote by an unrepresentative minority can be much worse for everyone involved.