@inquiline Meanwhile, the CEOs claim that they are invaluable to the company. If the CEOs were to "strike," how long would the company last before things ground to a halt? My guess is that the company would operate longer with the CEOs "striking" than with the workers striking.
@TechyDad @inquiline We actually know the answer to this. During Japan's post-war reconstruction, their labor movement was in a pickle. They couldn't be seen as impeding the reconstruction, so they invented the reverse strike. They ran the factory as usual and barred management from entry. They found that the longer these strikes lasted, the more desperate management became to settle because there was no noticeable drop in productivity. I don't remember much more about it, but if I see the video again, I'll post it.

@Capheind @inquiline There's also this PDF.

Workers' control in early postwar Japan - Taylor & Francis Online https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14672715.1985.10409905

From my brief read, it sounds like American soldiers occupying Japan finally helped management get control of their facilities back (even though they were running just fine without management).