We argued our motion to dismiss in Andersen v. Stability AI.

Judge Orrick says he will likely dismiss all claims except the basic "training is infringement" claim (on which we did not move) with leave to amend. The court viewed plaintiff's other copyright
arguments as implausible (the assertion that the images are somehow captured in the model or the possibility that there is any output that is substantially similar to one of her works).

All in all a good day

@marklemley So to clarify for the initiated (me) the "training is infringement" claim survives, as it was not litigated as part of the motion to dismiss?