James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen"

https://lemmy.world/post/1758067

James Cameron on AI: "I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn't listen" - Lemmy.world

James Cameron on AI: “I warned you guys in 1984 and you didn’t listen”::undefined

It’s getting old telling people this, but… the AI that we have? Isn’t even really AI. It’s certainly not anything like in the movies. It’s just pattern-recognition algorithms. It doesn’t know or understand anything and it has no context. It can’t tell the difference between truth or a lie, and it doesn’t know what a finger is— it just paints amalgamations of things it’s already seen.

I’m not saying there’s nothing to be afraid of concerning today’s “AI”, but it’s not comparable to movie/book AI.

True but that doesn’t keep it from screwing a lot of things up.

I’m not saying there’s nothing to be afraid of concerning today’s “AI”, but it’s not comparable to movie/book AI.

Yes, sure

Yes, sure. I meant things like employment, quality of output

That applies to… literally every invention in the world. Cars, automatic doors, rulers, calculators, you name it…

With a crucial difference - inventors of all those knew how the invention worked. Inventors of current AIs do NOT know the actual mechanism how it works. Hence, output is unpredictable.

Lol could you provide a source where the people behind these LLMs say they don’t know how it works?

Did they program it with their eyes closed?

Yes I can. example
OpenAI peeks into the “black box” of neural networks with new research

"We do not understand" how LLMs work, admits OpenAI in quest to make them interpretable.

Ars Technica

“Whether you like it or not is irrelevant.”

That’s a very hostile take.

I just think it’s wild they wouldn’t know how it works when they’re the ones who created it. How do you program something that you don’t understand?! It’s crazy.

It is, sorry. It was a Reaction to the downvotes. But at this point I’m a bit allergic to the “it’s the same as every other invention” argument. It’s not, precisely for this reason. It’s a bit like “climate is always changing” - yes, but not within decades or centuries. These details are crucial.

they program it to learn. They can tell you exactly how it learns, but not what it learned (there are some techniques to give some small insights, but not even close to the full picture)

Problem is, how it behaves nepends on how it was programmed and what it learned after being trained. Since what it learned is a black box, we cannot explain their behaviour