deepinder_brarIt has begun !!! Now we need passwords for each other !!
cheerIsn’t that what we’ve already been using gpg for?
Is it a user problem or platform problem that more services don't implement some sort of OpenPGP solution? I mean to say, I absolutely agree this is a good idea, but is the obstacle the users or the services? I can see people getting really confused and not knowing to treat their private keys properly, etc. So are services afraid it'll drive users away or are services afraid of it for some other reason?
I feel like it’s kind of a mix of both. It’s definitely a hassle to use and check as a user, but I think part of the reason it is is because sites just treat it as an extra thing rather than integrate it into their service
Using what?
GPG is GNU Privacy Guard, but same thing.
I thought linking to the original would be more useful than an implementation, you’re right though
Don’t deep fakes always look a little clunky?
Yeah until they don’t anymore lol.
LumidaubThey could blame a bad connection.
RiskableWhen you’re 77 your eyes (and hearing and brain) don’t work as well as they use to. There’s a reason why old people are targeted for these kinds of scams.
Gr. It’s not the technology that pisses me off. It’s people forgetting the fundamental rule that everything on the internet is fake until definitively proven otherwise.
Even after proven, nothing digital should ever rise to 100% trust. Under any circumstances whatsoever. 99% is fine. 100% is never.
Hell, even real life inputs from your eyes don’t get 100% trust. People are well aware their eyes can play tricks. But somehow go digital and people start trusting, even though digital is easier to corrupt than irl information in every possible way.
hoodatninjaI think it's pretty unreasonable to expect someone in 2023 to not trust a video call from someone they know. We are entering that period now, but I could have easily been fooled the same way. I bet you could have too.
Perhaps its because I pre-date most internet technology, but I am extremely distrustful in all digital spaces. Everyone should’ve started being extremely distrustful years ago, if they weren’t already. Not today.
You don’t wait for a big problem to smack you in the face. That’s how you lose 40k like our elderly friend. You just get to be in the first wave of potential victims that way.
I grew up before the internet myself. I can't say I'm on high alert for fake video calls lol I will be moving forward, however, now that it's a credible threat.
I’m not saying I don’t make video calls, mind you. I just don’t trust them 100%. Haven’t on that specific one for awhile now.
Thus, if someone asked me for 40k via one, I would say no, and to contact me in person.
40,000 rupees is like $400. Would you ask your friend to meet you in person for that amount, especially if they live quite far away?
I did not consider that kind of conversion rate. No, I probably would not.
India had a purchase power parity compared to the US$ of > 24 in 2022, i.e., while you can exchange only ~400–500 US $ for ₹ 40,000, this amount of money will buy goods within India that would be worth $ 9,600–12,000 within the US. Exchange rates can be pretty misleading.
The problem is with senior citizens, even if we tell them to not believe things on internet and tell them to not trust any calls, they will eventually do the opposite once the scammer pretends to be someone close to them.
They cant even tell if a normal video is fake or real then how can they tell of someone on a video call is real pr fake, chances are once they see someone dear to them in danger and asking money they will forget everything you’ve told them about the internet and get scammed …
dan1101“Hello dear, it’s your mother. Haven’t heard from you in a while.”
“Nice try scammer, go to hell!!”
Semi-Hemi-DemigodThis was common advice for parents in the 80s and 90s. If someone had to pick me up from school unexpectedly my parents gave them a code word to tell me to let me know it wasn't a child abduction
according to the TV, child adoption is just an anti-semitic Qanon-adjacent conspiracy theory. No need for passwords! yay!
Dude had too much money. Simple.
Right now deepfakes doesn’t work well when the face is viewed from extreme angles, so you can ask them to slowly turn their face to the side or up/down as far as they can until the face is not visible. It also doesn’t work well when something obstruct the face, so ask them to put their hand in their face. It also can’t seem to render mouth right if you open it too wide, or stick out your tongue.
But as the tech improves, it might be able to handle those cases in the future.
Right now deepfakes doesn’t work well when the face is viewed from extreme angles, so you can ask them to slowly turn their face to the side or up/down as far as they can until the face is not visible.
or, you know, you can just pickup the phone and call them.
You might not be aware of it, but in India (and SEA), using whatsapp video call is a lot more common than calling using your carrier’s phone service. No one would think twice when receiving a whatsapp video calls there.
i am not aware of that, no, but my point is not that the video call itself is suspicious. it is that if you have have a suspicion for whatever reason, normal cell call for a verification is far easier than doing some strange gymnastics the person above suggested (which may or may not work).
I guess that also allows for some ‘benefit of the doubt’ from the point of view of the victim, it’s probably harder to spot artifacts that would be obvious on a TV or monitor screen when the image is v small, and any glitches could be due to the video stream / compression
So why is that? Why do people from other countries use WhatsApp instead of the carriers service? My family in the UK uses it for not only us yanks, but for each other in country as well…why? I’m not gonna download it, they can just email me or text me like a normal person. Like they insist on WhatsApp. I don’t fucking get it.
Two things really:
Unlike in the US, unlimited calls and unlimited sms is not a thing in many countries where WhatsApp is popular. In contrast, WhatsApp calls and messages are free. This was quite significant, especially early on when WhatsApp starting to get popular during the J2ME / Symbian era.
Now that everyone use it, if you don’t use it you’ll be that one weirdo who don’t use WhatsApp and people may choose to not contact you at all (especially if it’ll cost money to call you). Even businesses and banks have WhatsApp account these days, so not using WhatsApp will inconvenience you if you live where WhatsApp is dominant.
I had this attack tried on me. It was a video call from my friend’s Facebook account. If I didn’t know enough to be suspicious, I wouldn’t have answered. Luckily I have that friend on Signal, so I knew they wouldn’t have called me on Facebook asking for money. I tried calling on Signal, but they didn’t answer. They must’ve not had their phone on them. Calling their home phone worked, though, which is kind of a weird thought.
IverCoderTheir phone was probably offline at the moment.
Nah, they just leave it in another room sometimes and don’t care if they miss a call or notification.
“I’m not a cat.”
🇸🇵🇪🇨🇺🇱🇦🇹🇪🇷You certainly look like a cat.
I got one of these a few months ago. I could tell it was fake before I even answered, but I was curious so I pointed my own camera at a blank wall and answered. It was creepy to see my friend’s face (albeit one that was obviously fake if you knew what to look for) when I answered.
So this dude is out $8, hopefully he learned his lesson.
naveIt’s more like $500
It’s pretend money anyway so it can be worth anything.
Then give me your money
Here’s hoping for popularising secure communication protocols. It’s gonna become a must at some point.
WhatsApp video calls are end-to-end encrypted. A secure protocol means nothing in this context.
But key exchanges work.
Signal for example, will warn you when the person you are talking to is using a new device.
As long as the user heeds the warning, it is an effective stop, and at the very least gives the user pause.
If the signal safety number changes, but the communication stays on track, as in, the context of the conversation is the same, it’s unlikely to be a problem. But if the safety number changes and the next message is asking for money, that is a very simple and easy to process situation.
40000 Indian rupees = $487 USD.
Wow that’s a cheap surgery! Definitely not US.
anteatersYeah them paying in rupees might have been a hint to where it happened.
Indiana?
Hyrule
This comment made me laugh really hard, nice
Rob T Firefly“Come back when you’re a little… mmm… richer.”
Sorry link, I can’t give credit, Come back when you are a little mmmmmm richer
Hi. I’m calling you about your korok insurance.
TheSpookiestUserSource on the image? Seems to be a snippet of a longer article.
EDIT: looking up the text of the image gives me inshorts.com/…/kerala-man-loses-₹40000-as-video-c…, which is just the snipped text, but points at
hindustantimes.com/…/deepfake-scammers-trick-indi…
as the source. I get images get more engagement than links, but it’s important to have the source handy.
Kerala man loses ₹40,000 as video call from friend turns out to be deepfake
a man in kerala lost 40000 after scammers used deepfake technology to pose as his friend during a video call ps radhakrishnan got whatsapp messages from a person claiming to be his former colleague seeking 40000 for his sisterinlaws emergency surgery quotseconds later he called and looked exactly like my former colleaguehis face was visible it was clearquot said radhakrishnan
I was so hoping the crappy “hey, a text thing I want to share, let me take a fucking attributionless accessibility-poisoning screenshot and upload it like a psychopath instead of just copy/pasting the link to the text or the text itself like a decent human being” routine would die with Reddit. We should be better than that here.
I even get why, images inherently get more eyes on them than articles through links, but the least we can do is include the source in the post body.
sudoGuy who scammed his friend out of $500: oh, no it totally wasn’t me man. There was a video? Weird it must have been a deep fake
Fortunately, I hate videocalls and have no reason to use them, so if my friend videocalled me I’d ask what the fuck they were doing and immediately be suspicious.
Altima NEOEspecially if they were suddenly asking you for money.
My first thought would be “wtf? How did WhatsApp get installed” followed by throwing my phone in a lake.
I’m in the US and have a well off friend who had his Facebook hacked. The bad actors sent messages to his friends asking for to borrow $500 until tomorrow because his bank accounts were locked and he needed the cash. Someone who was messaged by the bad actors posted a screenshot of a deepfaked video call he received that caused him to fall for it. Wild times we live in!