PeacesAI learned from their work. Now they want compensation.
goetzitI never understand this argument. If I go to an art museum, look at all the works, and create an art piece inspired by what i saw, no problem. If I go to an art museum, look at the works, and create a computer program that can create an art piece based on what I saw, that is somehow different? Because of the single step of abstraction that was taken by making some software to do it?
So you can walk into an art museum, look at a Rembrant, a Da Vinci, and a Carlo, go home to a canvas, and jot up a fusion of the three?
Wow. You’re good.
I can’t just go home and create an AI that can create art either, clearly i was simplifying things for my example.
I suggest you look up the meaning of a “straw man” fallacy and form an opinion on the idea.
Your condescension isn’t adding to the conversation.
I think you’re missing my point entirely. Dangerously simplifying a non-simple issue is putting you in the category of “My kid could do that.”
I’m not addressing any points, I’m just saying that people don’t tend to listen to rude comments.
Even your reply to me is condescending. Tone matters if you want to have a productive conversation.
What part of your comment was not condescending?