San Francisco protestors are disabling autonomous vehicles using traffic cones | "It's a great time"

https://lemmy.world/post/1347033

San Francisco protestors are disabling autonomous vehicles using traffic cones | "It's a great time" - LemmyWorld

Safe Streets Rebel’s protest comes after automatic vehicles were blamed for incidents including crashing into a bus and running over a dog. City officials in June said…

Thousands of accidents a year from human drivers. I sleep

90 accidents a year from autonomous vehicles. Lazer eyes

You make it sound like it’s a 50/50 split between human drivers and autonomous vehicles, which is definitely not the case.

There are way more human drivers than autonomous vehicles. So, when an autonomous vehicle runs your child or pet over or whatever, who do you blame? The company? The programmers? The DMV for even allowing them on the road in the first place?

What’s an autonomous vehicle do if it gets a flat? Park in the middle of the interstate like an idiot instead of pulling over and phone home for a mechanic?

You need to first ask yourself if it more important to put blame than to minimize risk.

“Autonomous vehicles could potentially reduce traffic fatalities by up to 90%.”

“Autonomous vehicle accidents have been recorded at a slightly lower rate compared with conventional cars, at 4.7 accidents per million miles driven.”

blog.gitnux.com/driverless-car-accident-statistic…

Driverless Car Accident Statistics And Trends in 2023 • GITNUX

As the world moves towards a more automated future, driverless cars are becoming increasingly popular. With this new technology comes an array of potential

GITNUX

So…

Your car is at fault. Their kid is dead.

Who pays for the funeral?

Does your insurance cover programming glitches?

If your insurance determined that an autonomous vehicle will cause less damage over time than a human driver, they will do that, yes.

Autonomous logic doesn’t pay insurance, does it?

If so, who TF is paying the insurance behind the scenes, and who is responsible?

If so, who TF is paying the insurance behind the scenes

The owner of the vehicle is probably very openly paying.

We’re talking about autonomous vehicles here, no driver, company owned.

So is Alphabet responsible?

Do your homework, these vehicles are owned by the parent company of Google and Apple, Alphabet. These vehicles have no private owner. So again, who TF is responsible?

So what? It’s not the gotcha you apparently believe to have found, companies can have insurance…
Companies also never seem to be held accountable. OceanGate anybody?..

That’s not a good example. Courts move slow and that just barely happened and AFAIK is still being investigated (plus searching, the participants signed wavers – though wavers don’t give immunity legal negligence).

There’s plenty of examples of companies being punished for negligence. It happens all the time when, say, their poorly constructed building collapses, cutting corners causes an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, they falsified their vehicle emissions reports, or when they abuse their market dominance.

When the vehicle disobeys orders from the police, who is at fault?

piped.video/watch?v=5Jev_R-JVmA

Piped

An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube frontend which is efficient by design.