FlaxBBC News - BBC: Claims about presenter 'rubbish' - young person's lawyer
HumanPenguinHmm. Have to admit. From the begining I questioned why the BBC seemed to be the target.
If the star broke the law. (And paying a 17yo for explicit pic def is). Hen why the hell are the parents not calling the police.
If its not illegal then as scummy as it may be. Its all consensual adul0ts make a choice.
As bad as I feel for younger people taken advantage of by older. The reason we have the 19 law. Is 18yp ha e a right to make theor own choice. Good or bad ones.
No other employer would have the right or expectation to address a member of staff following the law. And the police would be involved if its a crime. So why an attack on the BBC rather then a call to the police.
ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝The simple answer 8a because the right wing press will use any excuse to put the knife into the BBC. Quite how the Murdoch papers get away with such an obvious conflict of interest is a question that needs asking.
The only way or becomes a BBC matter is if it isn’t a crime but the shiftiness of the behaviour could bring the organisation into disrepute, especially after all the previous scandals and mishandling of situations, and they would want to think hard about letting the guy back on telly.