Hey there new people! Are you looking for a nice, well-run server to move to? I maintain a small site that lists them at:

➡️ https://fedi.garden

All of the servers listed obey the four rules of the Mastodon Covenant (https://fedi.garden/about-this-site/), but it's more than just Mastodon servers and they are all under 50k members.

I also do featured server posts introducing the listed servers.

#Fediverse

Fedi.Garden – An easy way to join Mastodon and the Fediverse

Highlighting nice servers on Mastodon and the Fediverse

@FediGarden why isn’t #islamophobia part of your “covenant?”

@InayaShujaat

There are a number of specific bigotries not on the list (including ableism etc) because I was trying to copy over the terms from the Mastodon Covenant (https://joinmastodon.org/covenant), in order to keep it as simple as possible for servers to comply.

I ought to expand the stated forms of bigotry, but would need to check with each server listed to make sure they comply with an expansion.

I'll try to work on this.

Mastodon Server Covenant for joinmastodon.org

@FediGarden Thank you. One of the unspoken issues with Mastodon is the fact that omission is often interpreted as permission. Because islamophobia is rarely mentioned, many think it’s acceptable behaviour. It’s also a top-down problem, with admins and mods engaging in incredibly islamophobic behaviour. The broader community does nothing about it, because it’s not explicitly listed as offensive behaviour.

@InayaShujaat

It's difficult with clauses about religion because some people (for example at the moment white christian fundamentalists in the USA) use religion as an excuse to do really horrible things, and I wouldn't want to shield such people from criticism.

But other people are victims purely because of their religion or tradition or background, for example the Rohingya in Myanmar, and they need protection.

1/2

@FediGarden The Rohingya are Muslim, and are persecuted because they’re Muslim.

Islamophobia is recognised as a form of bigotry, and it’s very different from the far right claiming to be discriminated against.

@InayaShujaat

I agree, I've tried to raise this in discussions about Facebook and their role in that persecution. (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/dec/06/rohingya-sue-facebook-myanmar-genocide-us-uk-legal-action-social-media-violence)

The question is how you formulate an anti-bigotry policy that protects victims but does not protect aggressors.

Northern Ireland is another example where religious divides don't necessarily connect to specific religious beliefs. People are being persecuted there because of the group(s) they belong to.

Rohingya sue Facebook for £150bn over Myanmar genocide

Victims in US and UK legal action accuse social media firm of failing to prevent incitement of violence

The Guardian

@InayaShujaat

Did you have a specific instance's rules that would be a good model?

I'm really not qualified to decide on these things, would be nice to see how it is done correctly.