Conservative women are embracing extremism under the guise of motherhood
Conservative women are embracing extremism under the guise of motherhood
What a wild journey the term âuseful idiotâ has taken. In 1959, Congressman Ed Derwinski of Illinois entered an editorial by the Chicago Daily Calumet into the Congressional record, referring to Americans who traveled to the Soviet Union to promote peace as âwhat Lenin calls useful idiots in the Communist gameâ. In 1961, American journalist Frank Gibney wrote that Lenin had coined the phrase useful idiot. Gibney wrote that the phrase was a good description of âCommunist follower[s]â from Jean-Paul Sartre to left-wing socialists in Japan to members of the Chilean Popular Front. In a speech in 1965, American diplomat Spruille Braden said the term was used by Joseph Stalin to refer to what Braden called âcountless innocent although well-intentioned sentimentalists or idealistsâ who aided the Soviet agenda.
Writing in The New York Times in 1987, William Safire discussed the increasing use of the term useful idiot against âanybody insufficiently anti-Communist in the view of the phraseâs userâ, including Congressmen who supported the anti-Contras Sandinistas in Nicaragua and the Dutch socialists. After President Ronald Reagan concluded negotiations with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev over the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, conservative political leader Howard Phillips declared Reagan a âuseful idiot for Soviet propaganda.â
The Economist published a 2023 article titled âVladimir Putinâs useful idiotsâ; it describes âUseful Idiot narrativesâ that support Putinâs aims and denigrate his perceived enemies.
It was entirely intentional, and funny piece of history you leave out that this phrase was in fact, NOT coined by Lenin and it was in fact, coined by US intelligence to describe how project mockingbird could be used to create useful idiots to server intelligence purposes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot#False_attribution_to_Lenin
Are you claiming they donât deceptively edit footage?
Literally the second sentence of their Wikipedia entry says so.
So I see no reason to believe anything they present. Why should I take a proven liarâs word for anything? âItâs on video?â Great. Do they show the context? No.
the wikipedia sentence says the phrase!!!
Wow. Are you literally 9 years old?
Holy crap, this is my only chance? Please don't do that :(
You first waited 23 minutes for me to reply and then you responded immediately with a extremely low effort baiting post.. you and your "people" have done no due diligence here, and nothing of the sort that would bring any credibility to your stance.