Apparently even though the online poster session for the ALAN light pollution conference isn't for 2 weeks, I have to get my poster uploaded by tomorrow.

Which means I get to spend ALL DAY frantically putting together a poster on satellite pollution and stewing about how much I HATE Starlink. I am going to need to smash something very badly when I'm done with this poster...

Just so we're all on the same page, there are currently 4,365 Starlink satellites, out of 8,111 total satellites in orbit (Starlink is 54% of all satellites - I sincerely hope they don't fuck up any of the collision avoidance maneuvers they do every single day...)
Hey billionaires, I found your satellites. They're right here, fucking up my telescope data.

@sundogplanets pout ... I'm summoning up a huge solar flare or mass magnetic field disruptor to rid all those satellites ... hugz

Hugz & xXx

This is actually less funny than you may be aware of, @melissabeartrix.

The starlink satellites are of military importance: The low ping times achievable make worldwide USA drone attacks possible, remotely controllable from USA home turf.

China knows this.

In a conflict, one way for China to remove this military ability from the USA is, to ignite a hydrogen bomb up there in space.

This is bad for a bunch of reasons. One is: This would create a massive space debris cloud.
@sundogplanets

@dj3ei @sundogplanets

Wouldn't that, if china does that it will also affect them ? ... It wouldn't make sense for one nation to blow the satellites

And with the cloud of debris, well if there is a solar flare or magnetic disruption I think the cloud of debris would be the least of the problems ... It may even be a help to the plant if said cloud was dense enough ... Just saying

Hugz & xXx