Anyone using rustic?
Hey, you probably know about restic and borg for backups. They are pretty mature and very commonly used. Rustic [https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic] is a fully compatible reimplementation of restic in Rust and they do seem to have implemented a few improvements over restic. The developer even used to be a contributor on restic. Is anyone here using it already? It looks super promising but I’d love to hear your opinion!
maiskanzler
Nine
anteatersfd instead of find, or rg instead of grep and tell me there’s no gain. The speed increase alone is astounding, and beyond worth it.
It sounds like they have some nice improvements, but I wonder why they didn’t contribute them back to the original restic project.
I also wouldn’t rely on an immature piece of software to handle backups - you want to avoid as many risk factors as possible with backups, since when you need to restore you really need it to work.
Q. How do you know an open source project is written in Rust?
A. Don’t worry, they’ll tell you.
I use restic extensively, and it works really really well... until it breaks. Then there's next-to-nothing you can do to fix the repo.
Rustic, on the other hand, has lock-less design, and repair options, so I end up using it to fix things. However, it has a number of rough edges: it uses its own wacky config file, its include/exclude options are wildly different and a bit painful, and to use a bunch of repo backends (like S3), you need to install, configure, and use rclone, which is poorly documented by rustic.
a1studmuffin
tylerh
th0mcat