@julieofthespirits @aparrish @jomc for sure, the thing I've noticed in these discussions is that people seem to always lean towards wanting to make these pseudo-philosophical statements about art that are all to varying degrees downstream of the conservative PragerU-tier idea that "art" is either like Western and European rennaissance stuff or it's not "real art" (whatever tf that is). it misses the point, one which as you said we have really good established examples of really with electronic music, of how something that is fundamentally *in*human, artificial, uncanny, etc. can have artistic merit (again, whatever that is).
idk to me it feels very obvious and simple that you know it when you see it when something produced by technological means has some interesting quality to it. I've only ever seen that though with the recent "AI" fad when it involves it not functioning as intended, which is itself kind of interesting to explore really but there's always a downward pressure from these "AI" companies ofc precise to *prevent* people from "mis"using their products to do anything interesting.