This 👇 is what happens when the Supreme Court signals to lower courts that they don’t need to be constrained by either facts or legal doctrine

The idea that government cannot work with private companies to stop the spread of disinformation — especially in the service of public health and preventing election interference has no basis in constitutional law

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/04/business/federal-judge-biden-social-media.html

Federal Judge Limits Biden Officials’ Contacts With Social Media Sites

The order came in a lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, who claim the administration is trying to silence its critics.

The New York Times
The standard for a substantial likelihood of success — what is needed for an injunction — requires a significant factual showing and not, as what appears to have happened in this case, wild speculation and conspiracy theories
@joshuaengel this seems to imply that serious lies were used to get it?