Cassandrich@drewdevault I don't do CLAs unless I'm being paid for it. Such nonsense. And I try to practice the flip side too. That's a large part of what went into making #musl MIT. I did not want a dynamic where I had asymmetric authority to relicense other ppl's contributions but they not have same for mine.
bgt lover@dalias what do you mean by that? isn't the gpl good? MIT allows corpos to use our code, while keeping proprietary mods to themselves, they aren't required to push stuff upstream, I'm not sure if they have to credit you either, so they can just take your code, make trillions with modifications based on it, then spit on your efforts, aka the core.js developer.
federico@dalias @[email protected] I would have no problem with a CLA that only allows the original authors to change license from LGPL to GPL to AGPL, or update to newer versions of the *GPLs.