THREAD: Bias and disparity in a causal modeling framework.

1. A few months ago, @vtraag and @LudoWaltman posted a superb paper to the arXiv.

http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13665

I've been meaning to write about it for a while and finally found the time.

Causal foundations of bias, disparity and fairness

The study of biases, such as gender or racial biases, is an important topic in the social and behavioural sciences. However, the literature does not always clearly define the concept. Definitions of bias are often ambiguous or not provided at all. To study biases in a precise manner, it is important to have a well-defined concept of bias. We propose to define bias as a direct causal effect that is unjustified. We propose to define the closely related concept of disparity as a direct or indirect causal effect that includes a bias. Our proposed definitions can be used to study biases and disparities in a more rigorous and systematic way. We compare our definitions of bias and disparity with various criteria of fairness introduced in the artificial intelligence literature. In addition, we discuss how our definitions relate to discrimination. We illustrate our definitions of bias and disparity in two case studies, focusing on gender bias in science and racial bias in police shootings. Our proposed definitions aim to contribute to a better appreciation of the causal intricacies of studies of biases and disparities. We hope that this will also promote an improved understanding of the policy implications of such studies.

arXiv.org
@ct_bergstrom @vtraag @LudoWaltman
Thank you for sharing this paper, which I haven't seen. In sociology we would more often call these discrimination (bias) and inequality (disparity), but have defined them similarly forever. See, e.g., https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740, https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/soc4.12372, and etc
@LudoWaltman @philipncohen @vtraag I figured there was nothing new under the sun, but I quite like the way that this paper made it very clear to me what was going on by using the machinery of causal modeling.
@philipncohen @ct_bergstrom @LudoWaltman Thanks! It was our impression that scholars often do not make clear what they understand with bias and disparity. Nonetheless, something like (direct) causality often seems to be implicitly assumed (although not always). We just wanted to make that explicit so that we can have a clear discussion about the topic.
@vtraag @ct_bergstrom @LudoWaltman I agree. Nice paper! Bias is also maybe a better term for individual behavior. In sociology we are tangled up with "structural" and "institutional" discrimination that is harder still to operationalize.

@vtraag @philipncohen @LudoWaltman

It was extraordinarily useful for me.

So useful, in fact, that I'm laboring through the entirety of Judea Pearl's book.