To anyone thinking about joining BlueSky, especially artists: everything you post is sent to a third party for AI labeling.

BlueSky uses AI to label content for moderation, and to do that they use a company called https://thehive.ai. If you look through their privacy policy, you will see that they can use content sent to them to train models for all their services, which include generative AI for both text and images.

Update: https://meow.social/@FluffyDeveloper/110652053858910840

#ai #bluesky

@FluffyDeveloper where is the link to their privacy policy? I can't find it with a simple search and I'm curious.

@murm Here you go :)

Look under "How We Use Information We Obtain”, 4th bullet point.

https://thehive.ai/privacy

@FluffyDeveloper no i mean bluesky's, sorry
atproto/packages/bsky/src/labeler/hive.ts at main · bluesky-social/atproto

Social networking technology created by Bluesky. Contribute to bluesky-social/atproto development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
@FluffyDeveloper Frankly if bluesky doing this without stating as such in their own privacy policy that's twice as disgusting tbh. Thank you so much for pointing this out either way. I'll be sure to use this info to warn others

@murm I cannot find their privacy policy either, nor any terms of service, even on their company site.

Maybe it's visible during signup?

@FluffyDeveloper imagine if they just don't have one because "ITS IN BETA"

God.
@murm I'd think they would have to have one regardless of the readiness of the software, especially for European users to follow the GDPR.

@FluffyDeveloper @murm it's here:

https://blueskyweb.xyz/support/privacy-policy

And the applicable part appears to be this bit (anything you post on Bluesky is completely public anyway, so I guess it doesn't really matter whether they send it somewhere or whether someone harvests it directly):

Privacy Policy - Bluesky

@russss @FluffyDeveloper @murm Hmmm. "Public" from a privacy point of view and from a usage point of view seem quite distinct. If I put a picture on my website, it's public, doesn't mean anyone can just use it how they like.

I think maybe https://blueskyweb.xyz/support/tos, section 7.4, is more relevant. Even then, those rights are in relation to running the service, so it looks borderline at best. Have I missed a more relevant section?

Terms of Service - Bluesky

@sgf @FluffyDeveloper @murm I think that bit's just standard boilerplate that some lawyer has regurgitated, and I wouldn't read too much into it. But I certainly don't think that restricts them from sending your content to some other AI service.

Two separate questions here: do they have a license to do this with your content? (Probably.) Is this allowed under the GDPR/CCPA/whatever? (I have no idea, but if it isn't then the whole distributed AT protocol thing is potentially unworkable.)

@russss @sgf @murm I don’t think GDPR explicitly forbids it, hence why the EU commission is working on the AI act.

Besides, I would be surprised if they would do it without being sure that they were in the clear. There is probably some legal loophole or tiny print that lets them do it.

@FluffyDeveloper @russss @sgf @murm likely that part is general so they have a license to do what they want in the broadest sense. Since distribution and potentially reframing are common activities, they can easily refer to those actions while later revealing that everyone agreed to their work being licensed when they release BS.AI or some stupid shit like that.