So let me get this straight. The Supreme Court is only supposed to take cases where there is a real injury and real controversy, but it took the case of a web designer who faked a request by a gay customer for a website design? The guy was actually straight, married and with kids?

Vacate this case.

@georgetakei Agree, why isn't there more discussion on why this case was chosen? I also wanted to hear more about the business license requirements of that state and how the court has circumvented those requirements.