So let me get this straight. The Supreme Court is only supposed to take cases where there is a real injury and real controversy, but it took the case of a web designer who faked a request by a gay customer for a website design? The guy was actually straight, married and with kids?

Vacate this case.

@georgetakei

I wonder what fresh hell we would be in if Biden just declared that the executive will disregard advisory opinions given to petitioners who do not have standing.

To a simpleton like me, it seems he has as much authority to do that as they have to give advisory opinions in the first place.

@RaymondEdwardF @georgetakei It does bring into question the power of the president, vs. the supreme court, who seems to have the power to ignore or reinterpret the framework of our constitution if they so wish.

Let's say, for example only, we had 9 conservative justices who decided to completely re-interpret the constitution thus putting us back to the 1950’s standards where most discrimination, for any group, was considered normal. Hell, we're just lacking 3 or 4 right now! WHO has the power to circumvent or abolish the court, should that happen? Anyone? We really need to know that answer, and I don't know it.

@RaymondEdwardF

Andrew Jackson did this and faced zero consequences for it.

@Fylkir

Starry diets! That's latin for precedent.