Our incoming Exeter UCU treasurer, Matt West @westbynoreaster, has studied our local/national finances. The reality is that academics in pre-92s are on a different planet to post-92s, on the whole, and the difference between their income/career prospects and professional services staff is egregious. The sector is massively unequal in terms of pay, and national pay bargaining can’t address that - or at least no one’s proposing to address, let alone fix that hierarchy.
@ucu #ucu
@alexprichard @ucu @westbynoreaster super work. Comparative data from the 2000s would be great.
From a visualisation pov, I'd recommend using pre92/post92 rather than Russell Group Yes/No as a legend label.
Q is about long term viability of institutions of teaching focused institutions where student fees have been capped with no inflation adjustment; with a gov that doesn't want to centrally fund unis.
Some capital expenditures have been daft, some good (more on-campus student housing for UWE)
@DToher @ucu @westbynoreaster hi @DToher thanks for the thumbs up! We plan to do a pre- post-92 version, but since Exeter compares itself to the RG, for our purposes locally, this worked better. Comparative data that far back won’t be comparing the same things. The sector isn’t the same post-2010. But maybe there are specific things we could compare? What do you think?

@alexprichard @ucu @westbynoreaster need to have a think on that one about available metrics.

It may be something to do with a split on proportion of income from teaching - probably needs more than 2 groups.

@DToher @alexprichard @ucu I used the most recent dataset as that was relevant for discussions NOW, but agree a proper longitudinal study would be of great value. Just to note, university finance is not my area of expertise nor my job, so I have limited time to investigate things and must be choosy with what I focus on.