SCOTUS struck down AA b/c it’s allegedly discriminatory. Here’s the Facts:
•AA benefitted white women more than all other groups COMBINED—plaintiffs never complained about that
•43% of white Harvard students are legacy or athlete students, of which 75% would not be admitted otherwise—plaintiffs never complained about that
•Asians are 6% of the population & 26% of Harvard admissions—plaintiffs never complained about that

This SCOTUS ruling is 100% anti-fact & 100% anti-Black racism.

@QasimRashid I would have said the same. WAPO posted a chart today showing how different groups did in states where AA is banned nd where it isn't. Surprisingly, Black representation INCREASED were it was banned. Hispanic representation plummeted. Black people are still ridiculously underrepresented, but it seems that AA was helping Hispanics, not them. So, while I agree about the motives of the plaintiffs, I think they got it wrong.
@QasimRashid Sorry, my save of the image didn't work. Derek So posted it above though.