@MrEUser I just hate the term “boomer shooter.” Can we do away with that please?
Back in the day we used to just call them "Doom Clones". If it wasn't for Doom (2016) we could have gone back to that.
Considering it’s been in use for years, and I wrote an article on it, I don’t see it going away…
Silly Saturday, B.S., and Boomer Shooters - Lemmy Ninja Clan

While some individuals apply their critical thinking skills towards addressing significant issues in society, a peculiar subset chooses to engage in what can only be described as the most frivolous form of discourse. It’s a peculiar phenomenon where adults fuss about matters that, in the grand scheme of things, have as much impact as a feather landing on the surface of the moon. One such topic that has stirred a tempest in a teacup is the term “boomer shooter” used to categorize a genre of first-person shooter games. The term “boomer shooter” is a tongue-in-cheek nod to a genre of games reminiscent of classic first-person shooter titles, hallmarks of the gaming world’s proverbial ‘boomer’ generation. It is a blend of homage and humor, affectionately referencing the games of yore that laid the groundwork for the gaming landscape we appreciate today. But alas! Not everyone seems to be able to appreciate this jovial nod to history. There exists a group that deems the term offensive, trivializing their arguments into complaints about a name rather than enjoying the games themselves. This faction of discontented people takes umbrage with the term, decrying its usage as both ageist and derogatory, and generally making a mountain out of this pixelated molehill. Their objections are as passionate as they are pointless, transforming the comment sections into virtual battlegrounds of lexical warfare. But what’s noteworthy is that their criticisms never seem to evolve into solutions. They attack the term “boomer shooter” with fervor but provide no alternatives, preferring to wallow in discontent rather than proposing an amicable resolution. Let’s pause and ponder: What might the situation look like if these keyboard warriors channeled their energy into something more constructive? Picture a world where their fervor is redirected to propose alternative terms, facilitate constructive discussions, or perhaps even design their video game that might shape the future of the industry. But alas, this image of proactivity seems too far-fetched amidst the current scenario of incessant griping. While it can be entertaining to observe these individuals wage war on inconsequential matters, it’s equally confounding. A term like “boomer shooter” is a light-hearted nod to a classic era in gaming history and should be perceived as such. But for those who opt to take offense and express outrage, here’s a radical thought: instead of criticizing without providing solutions, why not channel that energy into proposing a better term? Who knows, such an initiative might not only end this petty dispute but could also add another amusing chapter to the annals of gaming history. #satire #clownershooter #boomer_shooter

@MrEUser Well why’d you have to go and do that then? I’m blaming you for all of this.
It’s ALL my damned fault… Wait til you see this weeks articles. I’ll probably be thrown off the innertoobz.

it’s been in use for years

No it hasn't.

Inverse used it at least two years ago. We done here?
OK Boomer Shooter: How indie games breathed new life into a dying genre

Games like 'Dusk', 'Amid Evil', and 'Into the Pit' are shining examples of a new FPS subgenre: the "boomer shooter" inspired by games like 'Doom' and 'Quake'.

Inverse
Here’s another from March of 2021, so yes, used for years.