llamaLawyers: Internal email proves Microsoft's Activision bid is designed to eliminate PlayStation
speaker_hatMicrosoft wants total control over every market they can
If game companies would stop consolidating themselves into bigger and bigger corporations, that would be great. The bigger the company, the more profits they need in order to sustain themselves at their size. There is only so much you can profit from games without turning them into microtransaction mess. There must be a sweet spot for game company size so they're able to produce AAA games without needing to add microtransaction to make the game profitable to pay their employees.
It would also be great if game companies stopped trying to isolate themselves. Stop building your own launchers and shops and stop resisting GeForce Now and similar services.
Oh no, they appear to have highlighted all of the important parts with a sharpie
Matt Booty made a stupid booty mistake.
Also, every big company wants a monopoly.
BaroqueInMindYikes. Sounds like the FTC needs to step in and wrist-slap them with a meaningless fine.
how about a day's profits? okay, a half-day's profits, final offer.
hybrid havocA fine for.. what?
Anticompetitive practices. Those are illegal.
And the practice in question here is... A statement we haven't seen?
The FTC defines anticompetitive practices as:
Anticompetitive practices include activities like price fixing, group boycotts, and exclusionary exclusive dealing contracts or trade association rules, and are generally grouped into two types:
- agreements between competitors, also referred to as horizontal conduct
- monopolization, also referred to as single firm conduct
I don't think you can rightly say that making a statement is itself worthy of being called monopolization, even if we actually knew what was said.
That's literally all the article is. Matt Booty said something that some people suing Microsoft want to claim is indicative of their intentions with regards to the Activision deal, which at the time the thing was said was still several years in the future.
Yes, Microsoft would like to dominate the console market and leverage that to push people into the Microsoft PC ecosystem.
Since they've done poorly with the "make a better console with games people want" strategy, they've pivoted to their strength, which is a huge pile of money that they can deploy to try and get control of the content which Sony can't match.
They'll say what they need to in order to get this approved, but long term they'll absolutely leverage their ownership to achieve their goals.
Yes and they also want to dominate the "absolutely everything else" market ; if not now, eventually. If they could just own all the world's data and all the worlds operating systems and all the world's gaming platforms and all the world's everything-else, that would be just ducky, I'm sure.
cydThat's Microsoft's playbook. If you don't offer a better product than your competitor, pull out every dirty trick in the book to undermine them.
EnitoniGod forbid companies actually improve their products? Seriously the greed that has amassed throughout the decades is insane.
From the link:
Yes, but: A Microsoft representative told Axios that the company cannot legally share the email's contents, but that it was sent by Booty in 2019.
That would mean that whatever Booty may have said about Xbox trying to beat PlayStation preceded the company's early 2022 bid to buy Activision Blizzard.
Yeah… don’t they get that makes it worse since it shows forethought?
That is making the assumption that the statement - which we haven't actually seen - can be tied back to the Activision thing whatsoever.
Without actually knowing what the statement was, this is nothing but inviting people to fill in the blank however they wish.
Without the text of the email how does this news mean anything other than "one side of a legal battle believes they are in the right"?
And aside from the fact that I'm not sure how buying Activision would "eliminate" any gaming platform, how much does that differ from the stance any business has? Does anyone believe that Sony is not out to "eliminate" Microsoft, to borrow the term?
Because Activision is the single most important third-party game maker in the world outside of Japan. You wouldn't believe how many tens of millions of people buy PlayStations only to play CoD to the exclusion of everything else. If Microsoft gets CoD as an exclusive, then Sony will lose half their audience outside of Japan.
And Microsoft is a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition. Sony can't eliminate Microsoft; a lot of their software was made for Windows.
The Netscape playbook, I see.
I look forward to all the nothing that will happen to Microsoft as punishment for this.
eliminated playstation
LOL
ozonedEvery company wants to be a monopoly and not have to compete. Not sure why this is surprising especially considered Microsoft's historic monopoly on desktop.
Note that the lawyers are claiming this about the email, and we don't know what the email says.
In my experience, any sentence submitted in an appeal that starts with "The court also failed to consider" is usually a long shot. Especially if it's about stuff like whether certain evidence should be considered or published, because appellate courts almost never modify the decisions of the trial courts.