Still my favorite segment about why it's a bad idea to participate in bad-faith "debates" about science. They only result in further amplifying disinformation.

"People still think this issue is open to debate, because on TV it is. It's always one person for one person against. When you look at the screen, it's 50/50, which is inherently misleading."
@iamjohnoliver

@luckytran @[email protected]
It's worth noting that the 3% of papers that didn't conclude AGW was real have subsequently been reviewed as flawed. There are basically no peer reviewed papers that demonstrate AGW isn't real.
If the media was being fair, there would be none of these debates.
https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

Cornell Chronicle